Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;77(6):1533-1538.
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.026.

Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size

Affiliations

Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size

Michael M Kasumovic et al. Anim Behav. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

In the field, phenotypic determinants of competitive success are not always absolute. For example, contest experience may alter future competitive performance. As future contests are not determined solely on phenotypic attributes, prior experience could also potentially alter phenotype-fitness associations. In this study, we examined the influence of single and multiple experiences on contest outcomes in the jumping spider Phidippus clarus. We also examined whether phenotype-fitness associations altered as individuals gained more experience. Using both size-matched contests and a tournament design, we found that both winning and losing experience affected future contest success; males with prior winning experience were more likely to win subsequent contests. Although experience was a significant determinant of success in future contests, male weight was approximately 1.3 times more important than experience in predicting contest outcomes. Despite the importance of experience in determining contest outcomes, patterns of selection did not change between rounds. Overall, our results show that experience can be an important determinant in contest outcomes, even in short-lived invertebrates, and that experience alone is unlikely to alter phenotype-fitness associations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The distribution of the difference in (a) size (cephalothorax width) and (b) weight between competing males.

References

    1. Akaike H. Information measures and model selection. Bulletin of the International. Statistical Institute. 1983;44:277–291.
    1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.; 1994.
    1. Bowerman BL, O’Connell RT. Linear Statistical Models: an Applied Approach. Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.; 1990.
    1. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multi-model Inference. New York: Springer; 2002.
    1. Chenoweth SF, Blows MW. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. American Naturalist. 2005;165:281–289. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources