Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1045-53.

The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure

Affiliations
  • PMID: 20162108
Comparative Study

The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure

Jung-Han Choi et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of different screw-tightening sequences, forces, and methods on the stresses generated on a well-fitting internal-connection implant (Astra Tech) superstructure.

Materials and methods: A metal framework directly connected to four parallel implants was fabricated on a fully edentulous mandibular resin model. Six stone casts with four implant replicas were made from a pickup impression of the superstructure to represent a "well-fitting" situation. Stresses generated by four screw-tightening sequences (1-2-3-4, 4-3-2-1, 2-4-3-1, and 2-3-1-4), two forces (10 and 20 Ncm), and two methods (one-step and two-step) were evaluated. In the two-step method, screws were tightened to the initial torque (10 Ncm) in a predetermined screw-tightening sequence and then to the final torque (20 Ncm) in the same sequence. Stresses were recorded twice by three strain gauges attached to the framework (superior face midway between abutments). Deformation data were analyzed using multiple analysis of variance at a .05 level of statistical significance.

Results: In all stone casts, stresses were produced by the superstructure connection, regardless of screw-tightening sequence, force, and method. No statistically significant differences for superstructure preload stresses were found based on screw-tightening sequences (-180.0 to -181.6 microm/m) or forces (-163.4 and -169.2 microm/m) (P > .05). However, different screw-tightening methods induced different stresses on the superstructure. The two-step screw-tightening method (-180.1 microm/m) produced significantly higher stress than the one-step method (-169.2 microm/m) (P = .0457).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, screw-tightening sequence and force were not critical factors in the stress generated on a well-fitting internal-connection implant superstructure. The stress caused by the two-step method was greater than that produced using the one-step method. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of screw-tightening techniques on preload stress in various different clinical situations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances