Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;34(5):1109-14.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0474-8.

Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence?

Affiliations

Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence?

O Uludağ et al. World J Surg. 2010 May.

Erratum in

  • World J Surg. 2010 May;34(5):1115

Abstract

Background: In the past decade numerous studies have been published on the successful treatment of fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The underlying mechanism of action for lower bowel motility disorders has been unclear. In the present study, the effect of SNM on the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence was investigated.

Patients and methods: In 12 consecutive patients who qualified for SNM an X-defecography study was performed before SNM and at 6 months after permanent implant. Three single lateral rectal views were taken: one during rest, one during squeeze, and one during Valsalva's maneuver, after which the patient was asked to evacuate as rapidly and completely as possible during lateral fluoroscopy. At 6 months two further defecography studies were performed, one during stimulation with the pacemaker on and one with the pacemaker off.

Results: The defecography studies showed that the rectoanal angle decreased during rest, squeeze, and Valsalva's maneuver. A slight increase in rectoanal angle was seen during defecation. However, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Sacral neuromodulation improved fecal continence significantly in all patients at 6 months. Median incontinence episodes per week decreased from 6.2 to 1.0 (P = 0.001), and incontinent days per week decreased from 3.7 to 1.0 (P = 0.001) with SNM. There were no significant changes in the median resting and squeeze anal canal pressures, 46.5 versus 49.7 mmHg and 67.1 versus 72.3 mmHg, respectively. Median stimulation amplitude at follow-up was 2.7 V (range: 0.9-5.3 V).

Conclusions: Rectoanal angle did not decrease significantly in patients with fecal incontinence during SNM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jul;96(7):2158-68 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2005 Nov;92(11):1423-31 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):881-3 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1350-7 - PubMed
    1. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003 Mar;28(1):47-61 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources