Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence?
- PMID: 20162279
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0474-8
Sacral neuromodulation: does it affect the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence?
Erratum in
- World J Surg. 2010 May;34(5):1115
Abstract
Background: In the past decade numerous studies have been published on the successful treatment of fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The underlying mechanism of action for lower bowel motility disorders has been unclear. In the present study, the effect of SNM on the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence was investigated.
Patients and methods: In 12 consecutive patients who qualified for SNM an X-defecography study was performed before SNM and at 6 months after permanent implant. Three single lateral rectal views were taken: one during rest, one during squeeze, and one during Valsalva's maneuver, after which the patient was asked to evacuate as rapidly and completely as possible during lateral fluoroscopy. At 6 months two further defecography studies were performed, one during stimulation with the pacemaker on and one with the pacemaker off.
Results: The defecography studies showed that the rectoanal angle decreased during rest, squeeze, and Valsalva's maneuver. A slight increase in rectoanal angle was seen during defecation. However, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Sacral neuromodulation improved fecal continence significantly in all patients at 6 months. Median incontinence episodes per week decreased from 6.2 to 1.0 (P = 0.001), and incontinent days per week decreased from 3.7 to 1.0 (P = 0.001) with SNM. There were no significant changes in the median resting and squeeze anal canal pressures, 46.5 versus 49.7 mmHg and 67.1 versus 72.3 mmHg, respectively. Median stimulation amplitude at follow-up was 2.7 V (range: 0.9-5.3 V).
Conclusions: Rectoanal angle did not decrease significantly in patients with fecal incontinence during SNM.
Similar articles
-
Permanent sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence and associated urinary disturbances.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 May;19(3):203-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0523-y. Epub 2003 Sep 12. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004. PMID: 13680281
-
Sacral neuromodulation: long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with faecal incontinence.Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):1162-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02447.x. Colorectal Dis. 2011. PMID: 20955512
-
Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation.Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jul;49(7):1039-44. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0548-8. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006. PMID: 16721520
-
Sacral neuromodulation in patients with congenital faecal incontinence. Special issues and review of the literature.Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Feb;22(2):89-95. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1742-5. Epub 2018 Jan 16. Tech Coloproctol. 2018. PMID: 29340832 Review.
-
Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of defecation disorders.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97(Pt 1):341-50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_45. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007. PMID: 17691395 Review.
Cited by
-
Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS).Surg Today. 2014 Nov;44(11):2124-30. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0898-0. Epub 2014 May 5. Surg Today. 2014. PMID: 24792064
-
Anorectal angle at rest predicting successful sacral nerve stimulation in idiopathic fecal incontinence-a cohort analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;35(12):2293-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03720-w. Epub 2020 Aug 18. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020. PMID: 32812091 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous