Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;25(3):312-6.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-009-0035-8.

Interactive decision support for risk management: a qualitative evaluation in cancer genetic counselling sessions

Affiliations

Interactive decision support for risk management: a qualitative evaluation in cancer genetic counselling sessions

David W Glasspool et al. J Cancer Educ. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Genetic counselling for inherited susceptibility to cancer involves communication of a significant amount of information about possible consequences of different interventions. This study explores counsellors' attitudes to computer software designed to aid this process. Eight genetic counsellors used the software with actors playing patients. Clinicians' rating of expected patient satisfaction, content, accuracy, timeliness, format, overall value, ease of use, effect on the patient-provider relationship and effect on clinician's performance were evaluated via qualitative and quantitative analysis of interviews, training tasks and questionnaires. Most counsellors found the software effective. Concerns related to possible impact on consultation dynamics and content. Participants suggested countering these through appropriate new counselling skills and selective use of the computer. The REACT software could provide effective support for genetic risk management counselling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The REACT user interface. A plan is being developed for risk mitigation by manipulating actions in the planning chart (top). The outcome measure graph (middle) indicates the estimated risk of breast cancer, while arguments for and against prophylactic oophorectomy for this patient are reviewed in the information panel (bottom)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ. 2001;322:279–282. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.279. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1339–1346. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1339. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications—clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64:15–37. doi: 10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00183-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications—some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64(1):39–56. doi: 10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00184-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heathfield H, Pitty D, Hanka R. Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ. 1998;316(7149):1959–1961. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types