Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;19(8):848-57.
doi: 10.1002/pds.1867.

Multivariate-adjusted pharmacoepidemiologic analyses of confidential information pooled from multiple health care utilization databases

Affiliations

Multivariate-adjusted pharmacoepidemiologic analyses of confidential information pooled from multiple health care utilization databases

Jeremy A Rassen et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Mandated post-marketing drug safety studies require vast databases pooled from multiple administrative data sources which can contain private and proprietary information. We sought to create a method to conduct pooled analyses while keeping information private and allowing for full confounder adjustment.

Methods: We propose a method based on propensity score (PS) techniques. A set of propensity scores are computed in each data-contributing center and a PS-adjusted analysis is then carried out on a pooled basis. The method is demonstrated in a study of the potentially negative effects of concurrent initiation of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in four cohorts of patients assembled from North American claims data sources. Clinical outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI) hospitalization and hospitalization for revascularization procedure. Success of the method was indicated by equivalent performance of our PS-based method and traditional confounder adjustment. We also implemented and evaluated high-dimensional propensity scores and meta-analytic techniques.

Results: On both a pooled and individual cohort basis, we saw substantially similar point estimates and confidence intervals for studies adjusted by covariates and from privacy-maintaining propensity scores. The pooled, adjusted OR for MI hospitalization was 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.03, 1.41) with individual variable adjustment and 1.16 (1.00, 1.36) with PS adjustment. The revascularization OR estimates differed by < 1%. Meta-analysis and pooling yielded substantially similar results.

Conclusions: We observed little difference in point estimates when we employed standard techniques or the proposed privacy-maintaining pooling method. We would recommend the technique in instances where multi-center studies require both privacy and multivariate adjustment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest is found in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of proposed data integration method

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(1):1–9. - PubMed
    1. Friedenreich CM. Methods for pooled analyses of epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 1993;4(4):295–302. - PubMed
    1. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Ritz J, et al. Methods for pooling results of epidemiologic studies: the Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(11):1053–1064. - PubMed
    1. Maro JC, Platt R, Holmes JH, et al. Design of a National Distributed Health Data Network. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(5):341–4. - PubMed
    1. Lieu TA, Kulldorff M, Davis RL, et al. Real-time vaccine safety surveillance for the early detection of adverse events. Med Care. 2007;45(10 Supl 2):S89–S95. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms