Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;26(2):127-33.
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-08. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam

Ahmet Taylan Yazici et al. J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement among three different optical methods in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and pupil diameter.

Methods: One hundred eyes of 50 healthy patients (25 men, 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Mean patient age was 25 years (range: 21 to 32 years). Exclusion criteria were history of any intraocular or corneal surgery, contact lens wear, corneal anomalies, and spherical refraction >5.00 diopters (D) or cylindrical refraction >2.00 D. All measurements were done by the same operator under mesopic light conditions and repeated using three different optical methods: Visante optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb), and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).

Results: Mean CCT as measured by Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam was 529+/-30.5 microm, 554+/-32.7 microm, and 552+/-29.3 microm, respectively. Mean ACD values were 2.94+/-0.34 mm, 2.84+/-0.33 mm, and 2.98+/-0.33 mm, respectively. Mean pupil diameter measurements were 4.87+/-1.09 mm, 4.0+/-0.67 mm, and 3.05+/-0.59 mm, respectively. The Visante OCT measured CCT thinner and Orbscan measured ACD shallower than the other two methods. All three methods measured pupil diameters significantly different.

Conclusions: This study found some statistically significant but clinically insignificant differences among the optical methods assessed. The differences are small and do not influence decisions for refractive surgery in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources