Fuel-mix, fuel efficiency, and transport demand affect prospects for biofuels in northern Europe
- PMID: 20163088
- DOI: 10.1021/es903135c
Fuel-mix, fuel efficiency, and transport demand affect prospects for biofuels in northern Europe
Abstract
Rising greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the road transport sector represents a difficult mitigation challenge due to a multitude of intricate factors, namely the dependency on liquid energy carriers and infrastructure lock-in. For this reason, low-carbon renewable energy carriers, particularly second generation biofuels, are often seen as a prominent candidate for realizing reduced emissions and lowered oil dependency over the medium- and long-term horizons. However, the overarching question is whether advanced biofuels can be an environmentally effective mitigation strategy in the face of increasing consumption and resource constraints. Here we develop both biofuel production and road transport consumption scenarios for northern Europe-a region with a vast surplus of forest bioenergy resources-to assess the potential role that forest-based biofuels may play over the medium- and long-term time horizons using an environmentally extended, multiregion input-output model. Through scenarios, we explore how evolving vehicle technologies and consumption patterns will affect the mitigation opportunities afforded by any future supply of forest biofuels. We find that in a scenario involving ambitious biofuel targets, the size of the GHG mitigation wedge attributed to the market supply of biofuels is severely reduced under business-as-usual growth in consumption in the road transport sector. Our results indicate that climate policies targeting the road transport sector which give high emphases to reducing demand (volume), accelerating the deployment of more fuel-efficient vehicles, and promoting altered consumption patterns (structure) can be significantly more effective than those with single emphasis on expanded biofuel supply.
Similar articles
-
Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 15;45(2):789-95. doi: 10.1021/es1024004. Epub 2010 Dec 10. Environ Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 21142063
-
A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Oct;50(10):1769-79. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000. PMID: 11288305
-
Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment.Biotechnol Prog. 2006 Jul-Aug;22(4):1012-24. doi: 10.1021/bp050371p. Biotechnol Prog. 2006. PMID: 16889378 Review.
-
Comparison of PM emissions from a commercial jet engine burning conventional, biomass, and Fischer-Tropsch fuels.Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 15;45(24):10744-9. doi: 10.1021/es201902e. Epub 2011 Nov 15. Environ Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 22043875
-
Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges.Bioresour Technol. 2011 Jan;102(2):437-51. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Aug 6. Bioresour Technol. 2011. PMID: 20832298 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources