Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 17:4:11.
doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-11.

An iterative identification procedure for dynamic modeling of biochemical networks

Affiliations

An iterative identification procedure for dynamic modeling of biochemical networks

Eva Balsa-Canto et al. BMC Syst Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Mathematical models provide abstract representations of the information gained from experimental observations on the structure and function of a particular biological system. Conferring a predictive character on a given mathematical formulation often relies on determining a number of non-measurable parameters that largely condition the model's response. These parameters can be identified by fitting the model to experimental data. However, this fit can only be accomplished when identifiability can be guaranteed.

Results: We propose a novel iterative identification procedure for detecting and dealing with the lack of identifiability. The procedure involves the following steps: 1) performing a structural identifiability analysis to detect identifiable parameters; 2) globally ranking the parameters to assist in the selection of the most relevant parameters; 3) calibrating the model using global optimization methods; 4) conducting a practical identifiability analysis consisting of two (a priori and a posteriori) phases aimed at evaluating the quality of given experimental designs and of the parameter estimates, respectively and 5) optimal experimental design so as to compute the scheme of experiments that maximizes the quality and quantity of information for fitting the model.

Conclusions: The presented procedure was used to iteratively identify a mathematical model that describes the NF-kappaB regulatory module involving several unknown parameters. We demonstrated the lack of identifiability of the model under typical experimental conditions and computed optimal dynamic experiments that largely improved identifiability properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model building loop.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model building procedure incorporating the proposed model identification scheme.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Minimum identifiability tableau for the generating series method. A cross in the coordinates (i, j) indicates that the corresponding non-zero generating series coefficient depends on the parameter θj. Green crosses represent those parameters that can be computed from a single equation of the system. Green circles correspond to those parameters that may be uniquely identified, i.e. only one solution exist. Red crosses represent possible identifiability problems, i.e. sets of parameters that require more than 2 equations to be identified if possible. Red boxes and arrows represent sets of equations that result in an unique solution for the parameters. Numbers represent the order in which the equations were solved.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The NF-κB module. Network model as in [9]. The notation corresponds to that used in the mathematical model. Kinetic constants are indicated in blue; TR regards a logical function which is 1 when the signal is activated and 0 otherwise; kv represents the nuclear-cytoplasmic volume ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Identifiability tableau for the NF-κB model.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Ranking of parameters for the NF-κB example. Parameters are ordered by decreasing δmsqr using the mean rank as reference.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Sensitivity analysis in the range (formula image). δmsqr measures for the different combinations of parameters and observables for the three different experiments.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Practical identifiability analysis for the full set θ. Illustrative examples of the histograms of the solutions achieved with the Monte-Carlo based approach for t1, e2a and k2 under the experimental scheme ES1.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Experiments performed throughout the identification procedure.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Expected uncertainties for all parameters at the end of the identification procedure. Red line indicates the nominal value of the parameter, blue line indicates the mean value for the given experiment and yellow line indicates the estimated expected uncertainty.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Illustrative examples of the evolution of the robust uncertainty ellipses for several pairs of parameters. kprod-kdeg the most correlated parameters in all experimental schemes, i1-i1a the less correlated parameters in ES1 and ES2 and k1-k2 the less correlated parameters in ES3.

References

    1. Ideker T, Galitski T, Hood L. A New Approach to Decoding Life: Systems Biology. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2001;2:343–372. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kitano H. Systems Biology: A Brief Overview. Science. 2002;295:1662–1664. doi: 10.1126/science.1069492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cho KH, Wolkenhauer O. Analysis and modelling of signal transduction pathways in systems biology. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003;31:1503–1509. doi: 10.1042/BST0311503. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Janes K, Lauffenburger D. A biological approach to computational models of proteomic networks. Curr Op Chem Biol. 2006;10:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.12.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klipp E, Liebermeister W. Mathematical modelling of intracellular signaling pathways. BMC Neuroscience. 2006;7(Suppl 1:S10) - PMC - PubMed

Publication types