Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Apr;36(4):697-701.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1776-x. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

Greater cardiac response of colloid than saline fluid loading in septic and non-septic critically ill patients with clinical hypovolaemia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Greater cardiac response of colloid than saline fluid loading in septic and non-septic critically ill patients with clinical hypovolaemia

Ronald J Trof et al. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background and objective: The haemodynamics of crystalloid and colloid fluid loading may depend on underlying disease, i.e. sepsis versus non-sepsis.

Design and setting: A single-centre, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was carried out on 24 critically ill sepsis and 24 non-sepsis patients with clinical hypovolaemia, assigned to loading with normal saline, gelatin 4%, hydroxyethyl starch 6% or albumin 5% in a 90-min (delta) central venous pressure (CVP)-guided fluid loading protocol. Transpulmonary thermodilution was done each 30 min, yielding, among others, global end-diastolic volume and cardiac indices (GEDVI, CI).

Results: Sepsis patients had hyperdynamic hypotension in spite of myocardial depression and dilatation, and greater inotropic/vasopressor requirements than non-sepsis patients. Independent of underlying disease, CVP and GEDVI increased more after colloid than saline loading (P < 0.018), so that CI increased by about 2% after saline and 12% after colloid loading (P = 0.029). The increase in preload-recruitable stroke work was also greater with colloids and did not differ among conditions.

Conclusion: Fluid loading with colloids results in a greater linear increase in cardiac filling, output and stroke work than does saline loading, in both septic and non-septic clinical hypovolaemia, in spite of myocardial depression and presumably increased vasopermeability potentially decreasing the effects of colloid fluid loading in the former.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Mean ± SEM for cardiac index (CI) versus global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) according to fluid type (A saline; B colloid), at four time points of fluid loading, in non-sepsis patients. b Mean ± SEM for cardiac index (CI) versus global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) according to fluid type (A saline; B colloid), at four time points of fluid loading, in sepsis patients. For GEDVI and CI: increases differed between fluid types (P = 0.007 or lower), indicating greater rises in colloid than in saline loading, irrespective of underlying disease

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boldt J. Volume replacement in the surgical patient-does the type of solution make a difference? Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:783–793. - PubMed
    1. Perel P, Roberts J (2007) Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD000567 - PubMed
    1. The SAFE Study investigators A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2247–2256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dubois M-J, Orellana-Jimenez C, Mélot C, De Backer D, Berré J, Leeman M, Brimioulle S, Appoloni O, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Albumin administration improves organ function in critically ill hypoalbuminemic patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study. Crit Care Med. 2006;23:2336–2540. - PubMed
    1. Shoemaker WC, Schluchter M, Hopkins JA, Appel PL, Schwartz S, Chang PC. Comparison of the relative effectiveness of colloids and crystalloids in emergency resuscitation. Am J Surg. 1981;142:73–84. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(81)80015-3. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms