Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;16(4):769-80.
doi: 10.1261/rna.1897810. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

Identification of dynamical hinge points of the L1 ligase molecular switch

Affiliations

Identification of dynamical hinge points of the L1 ligase molecular switch

George M Giambasu et al. RNA. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

The L1 ligase is an in vitro selected ribozyme that uses a noncanonically base-paired ligation site to catalyze regioselectively and regiospecifically the 5' to 3' phosphodiester bond ligation, a reaction relevant to origin of life hypotheses that invoke an RNA world scenario. The L1 ligase crystal structure revealed two different conformational states that were proposed to represent the active and inactive forms. It remains an open question as to what degree these two conformers persist as stable conformational intermediates in solution, and along what pathway are they able to interconvert. To explore these questions, we have performed a series of molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent of the inactive-active conformational switch in L1 ligase. Four simulations were performed departing from both conformers in both the reactant and product states, in addition to a simulation where local unfolding in the active state was induced. From these simulations, along with crystallographic data, a set of four virtual torsion angles that span two evolutionarily conserved and restricted regions were identified as dynamical hinge points in the conformational switch transition. The ligation site visits three distinct states characterized by hydrogen bond patterns that are correlated with the formation of specific contacts that may promote catalysis. The insights gained from these simulations contribute to a more detailed understanding of the coupled catalytic/conformational switch mechanism of L1 ligase that may facilitate the design and engineering of new catalytic riboswitches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
(A) Ribbon representations of the crystallographic presumed inactive undocked (left) and active docked (right) conformations of the L1 ligase. Changes in four virtual torsions (labeled and colored) distinguish between the conformers. The regions that do not change significantly are shown in gray. (B) Variations of the virtual torsions (ΔTorsion, where Torsion indicates either η or θ) between the docked (active) and undocked (inactive) conformers as found in the crystal structure. The Δη (black) and Δθ (red) are shown. Only four virtual torsions, θ19, θ37, η38, and η44, show significant deviations (80.0° or more), whereas all other virtual torsions show relatively minor changes (typically, less than 25.0°). (C) Representative snapshots from the simulations illustrating the coupled on–off conformational switch–catalytic pathway starting from the active and inactive conformations, both in precursor and product states. (Middle panel) Representative snapshots from the simulations are shown with stems A and B (in yellow wire-frame surface) aligned and stem C in ribbons with transparent surfaces. (Left panel) Contacts important for stabilization of intermediate states that involve the conserved U19 and stem B. (Right panel) Interaction patterns for three states observed in the simulations between G1/GTP1 and the noncanonically base-paired ligation site. The states that do not appear in the crystal structure are indicated with curly arrows.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
(A,B) The U38 loop is responsible for allosteric control of the catalytic step by transitioning from a “closed” conformation, labeled “U conformation” (specific, as shown by our simulations, to the inactive/undocked conformers), to an “open” conformation, labeled “D conformation” (specific to the active/docked conformations). (A) Representative conformations for the U and D conformations. (B) Upper panel: During the Prod-D-UF simulation, where unfolding of the docked state was induced by removal of key interstem interactions, the complete transition between the two states was observed by monitoring θ37 and η38 virtual torsions. The values of the θ37 and η38 found in the two crystallized conformers are shown with blue and orange ×’s. (Lower panel) The θ3738 space sampled in the Prod-D-UF overlaps with regions sampled during the Prod-D (red) and Prod-U (blue) simulations. The center of each distribution is marked with black ×’s. For additional details on the distribution of the two virtual torsions during the Prod-D and Prod-U simulations relative to the Prod-D-UF simulation, see Supplemental Material. (C) Exploring connections between the flexibility of the three-way junction and the L1 ligase conformational switch. Representative structures for the conformational transition along θ18 toward the active conformation that brings U19 in the close proximity of stem B. Structure 1 is similar to the undocked crystal conformation (θ18 ≈ −110°). Structure 2 is the transition structure between structures 1 and 3 (θ18 ≈ 170°). Structure 3 shows a set of specific tertiary interactions between the conserved U19 and stem B (θ18 ≈ 90°). The time evolution of the hydrogen bonding contacts as well as the overall distribution of the virtual torsions can be found in Supplemental Material. (D) The noncanonically base-paired ligation site exhibits a high degree of conformational variability, passing through a series of three states (clusters 1, 2, and 3) characterized by specific hydrogen bond patterns between GTP1/G1 and the ligation site. Shown is the arrangement of the ligation site in the case of the Prec-MgTP simulations. (E) The time evolution of probabilities of the three cluster states, and their correlation with the formation of specific U71:HO3′–GTP1:O2Pα interactions, are shown for the Prec-D-MgTP simulation. For the corresponding Prec-D-XTP simulation results, see Supplemental Material.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen M, Tildesley D. Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 1987.
    1. Bagby SC, Bergman NH, Shechner DM, Yen C, Bartel DP. A class I ligase ribozyme with reduced Mg2+ dependence: Selection, sequence analysis, and identification of functional tertiary interactions. RNA. 2009;15:2129–2146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartel DP, Szostak JW. Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences. Science. 1993;261:1411–1418. - PubMed
    1. Bokinsky G, Zhuang X. Single-molecule RNA folding. Acc Chem Res. 2005;38:566–573. - PubMed
    1. Bunka DHJ, Stockley PG. Aptamers come of age—at last. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:588–596. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources