Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;127(5):251-8.
doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802009000500002.

Prevalence of chimerism after non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Affiliations

Prevalence of chimerism after non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Azulamara da Silva Ruiz et al. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Context and objective: Non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (NMA-HSCT) is performed in onco-hematological patients who cannot tolerate ablative conditioning because of older age or comorbidities. This approach does not completely eliminate host cells and initially results in mixed chimerism. Long-term persistence of mixed chimerism results in graft rejection and relapse. Involvement of graft-versus-host disease is concomitant with complete chimerism and graft-versus-tumor effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of chimerism in onco-hematological patients who underwent NMA-HSCT.

Design and setting: Observational clinical study on chimerism status after human leukocyte antigen-identical NMA-HSCT at the Discipline of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Universidade Federal de São Paulo.

Methods: We sequentially analyzed the amplification of APO-B, D1S80, DxS52, FVW, 33.6, YNZ-2 and H-ras primers using variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) on 17 pairs and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with the XY probe and SRY primer on 13 sex-unmatched pairs.

Results: The informativeness of the primers using VNTR was 60% for APO-B, 75% D1S80, 36% DxS52, 14% FVW, 40% YNZ-22 and 16% H-ras. The SRY primer was informative in female receptors with male donors. The XY-FISH method was informative in 100% of the sex-unmatched pairs.

Conclusion: These methods were sensitive and informative. In VNTR, the association of APO-B with D1S80 showed 88% informativeness. The quantitative FISH method was more sensitive, but had the disadvantage of only being used for sex-unmatched pairs.

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO:: O transplante de células hematopoiéticas não-mieloablativo é realizado em pacientes com doenças onco-hematológicas que não suportam condicionamentos ablativos devido à elevada idade ou ao acometimento por comorbidades. Esta abordagem não elimina completamente as células do hospedeiro, resultando, inicialmente, em quimerismo misto. A persistência do quimerismo misto na evolução de longo prazo resulta na rejeição ao enxerto e recaída. O acometimento pela doença do enxerto contra hospedeiro é concomitante ao quimerismo completo e ao efeito enxerto versus tumor. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a prevalência do quimerismo em doenças onco-hematológicas tratadas com o transplante não-mieloablativo de células hematopoiéticas.

TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL:: Estudo clínico observacional do estado de quimerismo após transplante antígenos leucocitários humanos-idêntico não-mieloabaltivo realizado na Disciplina de Hematologia e Hemoterapia da Universidade Federal de São Paulo.

MÉTODOS:: Analisamos sequencialmente a amplificação dos primers APO-B, D1S80, DxS52, FVW, 33,6, YNZ-22, H-ras pelo VNTR (variable number of tandem repeats) em 17 pares e FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) pela sonda XY e do primer SRY em 13 pares de não relacionados a sexo.

RESULTADO:: A informatividade dos primers pelo VNTR foi de 60% para APO-B; 75% D1S80; 36% DxS52; 14% FVW; 40% YNZ-22 e 16% H-ras. O primer SRY foi informativo em receptores femininos com doadores masculinos. O método XY-FISH foi informativo em 100% dos pares de não relacionado a sexo.

CONCLUSÃO:: Estes métodos foram sensíveis e informativos. No VNTR, a associação do APO-B com D1S80 mostrou 88% de informatividade. O FISH, método quantitativo, foi mais sensível, porém com desvantagem de ser usado somente nos pares não relacionados a sexo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Not declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Evaluation using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis marker D1S80 following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification (variable number of tandem repeats, VNTR technique) in case 7. (1) donor product; (2) patient product before transplantation; (3) and (4) donor and patient products after transplantation; (5) and (6) patient productsafter transplantation and after molecular relapse; (7) 100-base pair marker.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sreenan JJ, Pettay JD, Tbakhi A, et al. The use of amplified variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in the detection of chimerism following bone marrow transplantation. A comparison with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) by Southern blotting. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107(3):292–298. - PubMed
    1. Antin JH, Childs R, Filipovich AH, et al. Establishment of complete and mixed donor chimerism after allogeneic lymphohematopoietic transplantation: recommendations from a workshop at the 2001 Tandem Meetings of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(9):473–485. - PubMed
    1. Talwar S, Khan F, Nityanand S, Agrawal S. Chimerism monitoring following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(9):529–535. - PubMed
    1. Ariffin H, Daud SS, Mohamed Z, Ibrahim K, Lee TF, Chong LA. Evaluation of two short tandem repeat multiplex systems for post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation chimerism analysis. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(4):333–337. - PubMed
    1. Mackinnon S, Papadopoulos EB, Carabasi MH, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy evaluating escalating doses of donor leukocytes for relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation: separation of graft-versus-leukemia responses from graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 1995;86(4):1261–1268. - PubMed

Substances