Size invariance in curve tracing
- PMID: 2017027
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03198493
Size invariance in curve tracing
Abstract
Subjects decided whether two dots were on the same curve or on different curves in patterns consisting of two curves and two dots in displays that had an exposure duration of 200 msec or that remained in view until the subjects' response. The overall size of the patterns was varied by a factor of two. Furthermore, across experiments, we manipulated the predictability of the size of the pattern on a particular trial. On half of the trials, the two dots were on the same curve; across these trials, the distance between the dots, along the curve, was manipulated systematically while the Euclidean distance between the dots was held constant. On the other half of the trials, the two dots were on different curves. The time to respond same increased monotonically as curve distance between the dots increased, suggesting that subjects mentally traced the curve in order to perform the task. The absolute size of the pattern had little or no effect on the response times, indicating that it was curve distance relative to the overall pattern size, rather than absolute distance, that controlled response times. Furthermore, expectancies about pattern size had essentially no effect on performance. Taken together, the results suggest that the rate of tracing is determined by various stimulus properties that covary with the overall size of the pattern on which tracing takes place, such as the distance between the traced curve and nearby distractor curves, or the curvature of the traced curve.
Similar articles
-
Predicting the shape of distance functions in curve tracing: evidence for a zoom lens operator.Mem Cognit. 1991 Sep;19(5):469-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03199570. Mem Cognit. 1991. PMID: 1956308
-
Visual curve tracing properties.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Nov;17(4):997-1022. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.997. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991. PMID: 1837310
-
Manipulating the shape of distance effects in visual curve tracing: further evidence for the zoom lens model.Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Mar;48(1):1-24. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.48.1.1. Can J Exp Psychol. 1994. PMID: 8038765
-
Size invariance in visual number discrimination.Psychol Res. 1991;53(4):290-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00920482. Psychol Res. 1991. PMID: 1792300
-
Size-distance invariance: kinetic invariance is different from static invariance.Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):541-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03211651. Percept Psychophys. 1992. PMID: 1620566 Review.
Cited by
-
Reinforcement Learning of Linking and Tracing Contours in Recurrent Neural Networks.PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 23;11(10):e1004489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004489. eCollection 2015 Oct. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015. PMID: 26496502 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral vision and crowding in mental maze-solving.J Vis. 2024 Apr 1;24(4):22. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.4.22. J Vis. 2024. PMID: 38662347 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the shape of distance functions in curve tracing: evidence for a zoom lens operator.Mem Cognit. 1991 Sep;19(5):469-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03199570. Mem Cognit. 1991. PMID: 1956308
-
Effects of maze appearance on maze solving.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):637-649. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-03000-7. Epub 2025 Jan 10. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025. PMID: 39794655 Free PMC article.
-
Serial grouping of 2D-image regions with object-based attention in humans.Elife. 2016 Jun 13;5:e14320. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14320. Elife. 2016. PMID: 27291188 Free PMC article.