Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb 15;192(4):197-202.
doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03507.x.

AUSDRISK: an Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures

Affiliations
Comparative Study

AUSDRISK: an Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures

Lei Chen et al. Med J Aust. .

Erratum in

  • Med J Aust. 2010 Mar 1;192(5):274

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a diabetes risk assessment tool for Australia based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures.

Design and setting: 5-year follow-up (2004-2005) of the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study (AusDiab, 1999-2000).

Participants: 6060 AusDiab participants aged 25 years or older who did not have diagnosed diabetes at baseline.

Main outcome measures: Incident diabetes at follow-up was defined by treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycaemic agents or by fasting plasma glucose level > or = 7.0 mmol/L or 2-hour plasma glucose level in an oral glucose tolerance test > or = 11.1 mmol/L. The risk prediction model was developed using logistic regression and converted to a simple score, which was then validated in two independent Australian cohorts (the Blue Mountains Eye Study and the North West Adelaide Health Study) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) chi(2) statistic.

Results: 362 people developed diabetes. Age, sex, ethnicity, parental history of diabetes, history of high blood glucose level, use of antihypertensive medications, smoking, physical inactivity and waist circumference were included in the final prediction model. The AROC of the diabetes risk tool was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76-0.81) and HL chi(2) statistic was 4.1 (P = 0.85). Using a score > or = 12 (maximum, 35), the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for identifying incident diabetes were 74.0%, 67.7% and 12.7%, respectively. The AROC and HL chi(2) statistic in the two independent validation cohorts were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.60-0.71) and 9.2 (P = 0.32), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.86) and 29.4 (P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: This diabetes risk assessment tool provides a simple, non-invasive method to identify Australian adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes who might benefit from interventions to prevent or delay its onset.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types