Evaluation of early complications related to De Novo cardioverter defibrillator implantation insights from the Ontario ICD database
- PMID: 20170816
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.029
Evaluation of early complications related to De Novo cardioverter defibrillator implantation insights from the Ontario ICD database
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined the predictors of early complications after defibrillator implantation.
Background: Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are widely used, predictors of procedural complications and the consequences of these events have not been determined.
Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, population-based clinical outcomes registry of all newly implanted defibrillator patients at 18 centers in Ontario, Canada, we examined 45-day complications and all-cause mortality from February 2007 to May 2009. Complications were determined longitudinally and were categorized as direct implant-related or indirect events.
Results: Among 3,340 patients (mean age 63.8 +/- 12.5 years, 78.5% men), major complications occurred in 4.1% of de novo procedures. Compared with those undergoing a single-chamber device, implantation of a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38 to 3.43, p < 0.001) or dual-chamber device (adjusted HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.79, p = 0.006) was associated with increased risk of major complications. Major complications were increased in women (adjusted HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.16, p = 0.037) and when left ventricular end-systolic dimension exceeded 45 mm (adjusted HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.20, p = 0.018). Major complications (excluding death) occurring early after defibrillator implantation were associated with increased adjusted risk of subsequent death up to 180 days after defibrillator implant (adjusted HR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.64 to 8.33, p = 0.002). Direct implant-related complications were associated with increased risk of early death (adjusted HR: 24.89, p = 0.01), whereas indirect clinical complications conferred increased risk of near-term death (adjusted HR: 12.35, p < 0.001) after defibrillator implantation.
Conclusions: Complications after de novo defibrillator implantation were strongly associated with device type. Major complications were associated with increased risk of mortality.
Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of short-term complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement: results from the Ontario ICD Database.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;4(2):136-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.959791. Epub 2011 Feb 15. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21325209
-
Sex differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator outcomes: findings from a prospective defibrillator database.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Feb 7;156(3):195-203. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22312139
-
Causes and consequences of heart failure after prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial II.Circulation. 2006 Jun 20;113(24):2810-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.577262. Epub 2006 Jun 12. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16769917 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of cardiac and noncardiac conditions on survival after defibrillator implantation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 26;49(25):2408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.058. Epub 2007 Jun 11. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17599603
-
Impact of implant techniques on complications with current implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems.Am J Cardiol. 1996 Sep 12;78(5A):15-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00497-3. Am J Cardiol. 1996. PMID: 8820831 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of pocket hematoma after cardiac implantable electronic device surgery: A nationwide cohort study.J Arrhythm. 2022 Aug 18;38(5):748-755. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12769. eCollection 2022 Oct. J Arrhythm. 2022. PMID: 36237873 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal trends in quality of care among recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.Circulation. 2014 Feb 4;129(5):580-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003747. Epub 2013 Nov 5. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 24192798 Free PMC article.
-
The Dx-AF study: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing VDD-ICD to VVI-ICD in detecting sub-clinical atrial fibrillation in defibrillator patients.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;50(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0276-0. Epub 2017 Jul 27. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 28752228 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevalence and predictors of off-label use of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardiac-Defibrillator Registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 31;56(10):766-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.025. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20797489 Free PMC article.
-
Future Research Prioritization: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Older Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1812-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3411-6. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26014894 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical