Large diameter head metal-on-metal bearings total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results
- PMID: 20170852
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rcot.2009.12.006
Large diameter head metal-on-metal bearings total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results
Abstract
Introduction: Although the use of the metal-on-metal bearings has been validated over the long term in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for standard 28 and 32 mm diameters, and over the medium term in resurfacing procedures, the use of larger metal head size in conventional THA has not yet been extensively reported.
Hypothesis: The large-diameter metal-on-metal head is beneficial in terms of implant stability without altering the result in terms of function and bone fixation compared to the standard 28 and 32 mm diameters.
Objective: The objective was to test this hypothesis by assessing the short-term clinical and radio graphic results of a metal-on-metal large-diameter heads THA system, using cups from the resurfacing hip concept.
Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study on a continuous series of 106 uncemented acetabular cups (Durom) implanted in 102 patients (mean age, 66 years): 93 cases of primary or secondary coxarthrosis, 11 cases of aseptic osteonecrosis, one fracture of the femoral neck, and one case of rheumatoid arthritis of the hip. At 30 months of follow-up,the Harris Hip Score and the Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score were calculated. The radiological investigation included comparison of the implant head with native head diameters, variations of acetabular center of rotation, inspection for implant migration, and search for a gap or radiolucent line.
Results: The series included two post-traumatic dislocations as well as spontaneously receding tendinitis of the gluteus medius with no further recurrence. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 49.3 preoperatively to 91.6 at the latest follow-up and the mean PMA score ranged from 12 to 17. The results were excellent for 70 cases, good for 31 cases, fair for three cases, and poor for two cases. In the last five cases, the overall results were undermined by low pain subscore,with no identifiable explanation. Restoration of the original head diameter was verified for 65 hips. No cup migration was observed. Measurement of the acetabular centre of rotation showed a mean lateralization of 1.1mm. Of the 67 immediate postoperative gaps, only two did no disappear at follow-up. Implant head diameter, cup position, and the existence of a gap were not correlated with the clinical results.
Discussion: These results are comparable to 28 mm-diameter metal-on-metal heads in uncemented cups but with improved stability but without demonstrable alteration of the quality of the bone fixation. We found no mechanical or medical cause that could explain the five cases of persistent pain leading to fair or poor results. Long-term follow-up will validate these theoretical advantages in terms of wear and implant survival.
Level of evidence: IV. Retrospective series.
Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Results of the Evora dual mobility socket: five years follow-up].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Feb;94(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Feb 1. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008. PMID: 18342028 French.
-
Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years.Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Dec;94(8):e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.015. Epub 2008 Jul 7. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008. PMID: 19070709 Clinical Trial.
-
Cementless cups do not increase osteolysis risk in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Apropos of 106 cases.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Nov;95(7):478-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Oct 3. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19801209
-
[Large diameter femoral heads in primary alumina/alumina and XSPE/alumina total hip arthroplasty. A follow-up study of 50 hips after average 40 months and review of literature].Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2011 Jan-Feb;76(1):14-20. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2011. PMID: 21850992 Review. Polish.
-
Femoral head diameter considerations for primary total hip arthroplasty.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1 Suppl):S25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.026. Epub 2015 Jan 14. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25596984 Review.
Cited by
-
Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):509-20. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3976-0. Epub 2014 Nov 4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25367107 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0147872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147872. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26930057 Free PMC article.
-
Cementless large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years--a multicenter early result.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Jan;28(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.06.021. Epub 2011 Sep 15. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 22226059 Free PMC article.
-
Corrosion at the cone/taper interface leads to failure of large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3101-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2502-5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22864616 Free PMC article.
-
A Misdiagnosed Complication of a Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.Case Rep Orthop. 2018 Mar 15;2018:6413814. doi: 10.1155/2018/6413814. eCollection 2018. Case Rep Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29736286 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous