EOS orthopaedic imaging system to study patellofemoral kinematics: assessment of uncertainty
- PMID: 20170853
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rcot.2009.12.003
EOS orthopaedic imaging system to study patellofemoral kinematics: assessment of uncertainty
Abstract
Background: Accurate knowledge of knee joint kinematics, especially patellofemoral joint kinematics,is essential for prosthetic evaluation so as to further improve total knee arthroplasty performances. Improving the evaluation of the functioning of the extensor apparatus appears,in this respect, particularly important in this optimization effort.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to propose a new experimental setup for the analysis of knee joint kinematics and to validate its relevance in terms of accuracy and uncertainty.The technique developed herein combines 3D reconstruction imaging with the use of a motion capture system.
Material and methods: Eight pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver specimens with no evidence of previous knee surgery were studied using a new test rig where the femur remains fixed and the tibia is free to rotate. The flexion-extension cycles were executed using computer-controlled traction of the quadriceps tendon combined with an antagonist force applied to the distal part of the tibia. Knee joint kinematics were tracked using an optoelectronic motion capture system after a preliminary stage of data acquisition of bone geometry and markers position. This stage was carried out using a new digital stereophotogrammetric system, EOS, combined with specific 3D reconstruction software that also determined the coordinate system used in the kinematic analysis. The resulting uncertainty was assessed as was its impact on the estimated kinematics.
Results: Test results on eight knees validated the setup designed for the analysis of knee joint kinematics during the flexion-extension cycle. More specifically, the statistical results show that measurement uncertainty for rotations and translations remains below 0.4 and 1.8 mm,respectively, for the tibia and 0.4 and 1.2 mm for the patella (+/- 2 S.D. for all four measurements).
Discussion: The combination of 3D imaging and motion capture enables the proposed method to track the real-time motion of any bone segment during knee flexion-extension cycle. In particular,the new test rig introduced in this paper allows in vitro measurements of the patello femoral and tibiofemoral kinematics with a good level of accuracy. Moreover, this personalized experimental analysis can provide a more objective approach to the evaluation of knee implants as well as the validation of the finite-elements-based models of the patellofemoral joint.
2010 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Similar articles
-
[In vitro analysis of the continuous active patellofemoral kinematics of the normal and prosthetic knee].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Dec;88(8):797-802. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002. PMID: 12503021 French.
-
The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads.J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.011. J Orthop Res. 2004. PMID: 15183437
-
Normative three-dimensional patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic, in vivo study.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Jul;54(7):1333-41. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.890735. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007. PMID: 17605365
-
Biomechanics of medial unicondylar in combination with patellofemoral knee arthroplasty.Knee. 2014;21 Suppl 1:S3-9. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50002-6. Knee. 2014. PMID: 25382365 Review.
-
The influence of tibial and femoral rotation on patellofemoral contact area and pressure.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Nov;33(11):686-93. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.686. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003. PMID: 14669964 Review.
Cited by
-
Three-dimensional measurements of the lower extremity in children and adolescents using a low-dose biplanar X-ray device.Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):765-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2308-y. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Eur Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22011904
-
Recent advances in medical imaging: anatomical and clinical applications.Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Oct;34(8):675-86. doi: 10.1007/s00276-012-0985-0. Epub 2012 May 29. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012. PMID: 22644780 Review.
-
EOS imaging versus current radiography: A health technology assessment study.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Feb 17;30:331. eCollection 2016. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016. PMID: 27390701 Free PMC article.
-
EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations.J Child Orthop. 2016 Feb;10(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0. Epub 2016 Feb 16. J Child Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26883033 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of overcoverage parameters with varying morphologic pincer features: comparison of EOS® and radiography.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2578-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3001-z. Epub 2013 May 9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013. PMID: 23657877 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources