Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S123-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.078.

Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury

Affiliations
Review

Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury

Jeff M Michalski et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Erratum in

Abstract

The available dose/volume/outcome data for rectal injury were reviewed. The volume of rectum receiving >or=60 Gy is consistently associated with the risk of Grade >or=2 rectal toxicity or rectal bleeding. Parameters for the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman normal tissue complication probability model from four clinical series are remarkably consistent, suggesting that high doses are predominant in determining the risk of toxicity. The best overall estimates (95% confidence interval) of the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model parameters are n = 0.09 (0.04-0.14); m = 0.13 (0.10-0.17); and TD(50) = 76.9 (73.7-80.1) Gy. Most of the models of late radiation toxicity come from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy dose-escalation studies of early-stage prostate cancer. It is possible that intensity-modulated radiotherapy or proton beam dose distributions require modification of these models because of the inherent differences in low and intermediate dose distributions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dose–volume histogram thresholds found to be significantly associated with Grade ≥2 rectal toxicity. Thicker lines indicate higher rates of rates of overall toxicity (percentages are indicated on the graph along with the physical prescription dose). Threshold doses are expressed as linear-quadratic equivalent doses delivered in 2-Gy fractions, calculated using α/β = 3 Gy. The associated linear-quadratic equivalent prescription doses are coded by spectrum from lowest (blue), to highest (red). Volumes shown in the graph are based on the full length of the anatomic rectum. Curves for Huang and Wachter were adjusted downward by 15% and by 50% for Hart-ford, to account for the different definitions used for rectal volume. Dose–volume data from multiple centers converge at the high dose range, implying that these values are more consistently associated with toxicity. Abbreviations: LQ = linear quadratic

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andreyev HJ. Gastrointestinal problems after pelvic radiotherapy: The past, the present and the future. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007;19:790–799. - PubMed
    1. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1341–1346. - PubMed
    1. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 3.0. Washington, DC: Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; 2006.
    1. Jackson A, Skwarchuk MW, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Late rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. II. Volume effects and dose-volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:685–698. - PubMed
    1. Akimoto T, Muramatsu H, Takahashi M, et al. Rectal bleeding after hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Correlation between clinical and dosimetric parameters and the incidence of grade 2 or worse rectal bleeding. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1033–1039. - PubMed