Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S130-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.094.

Radiation dose-volume effects and the penile bulb

Affiliations
Review

Radiation dose-volume effects and the penile bulb

Mack Roach 3rd et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

The dose, volume, and clinical outcome data for penile bulb are reviewed for patients treated with external-beam radiotherapy. Most, but not all, studies find an association between impotence and dosimetric parameters (e.g., threshold doses) and clinical factors (e.g., age, comorbid diseases). According to the data available, it is prudent to keep the mean dose to 95% of the penile bulb volume to <50 Gy. It may also be prudent to limit the D70 and D90 to 70 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively, but coverage of the planning target volume should not be compromised. It is acknowledged that the penile bulb may not be the critical component of the erectile apparatus, but it seems to be a surrogate for yet to be determined structure(s) critical for erectile function for at least some techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: All other authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Penile and erectile tissue anatomy with CT (A) and MR (B–D) images of the penile bulb (*). Adapted from Wallner et al. (16).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Incidence of erectile dysfunction according to the radiation dose to the penile bulb. The x axis values are estimated according to the range of doses reported. The data for Fisch et al. (7) at 20, 55, and 80 Gy represent the reported rates of erectile dysfunction at <40, 40–70, and >70 Gy, respectively. Similarly, for Wernicke et al. (14) and Roach et al. (10), each symbol represents the rates of erectile dysfunction at ≤42 vs. >42 and <52.5 vs. ≥52.5 Gy, respectively. The dashed horizontal lines reflect the dose ranges ascribed to each data point. The upper x-axis range of the highest data point for Fisch et al. (7) and Roach et al. (10) are unknown. The mean doses of van der Wielen et al. (13) and Mangar et al. (8) are estimated from the subgroup data. The x-axis values for Wernicke et al. (14) are D60 and for Fisch et al. (7) are D70 (i.e., minimum dose received by 60% or 70% volume of the penile bulb). A thick solid line represents the fitted model with sample size correction, with 95% confidence intervals (dotted curves).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1250–1261. - PubMed
    1. Robinson JW, Moritz S, Fung T. Meta-analysis of rates of erectile function after treatment of localized prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:1063–1068. - PubMed
    1. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–830. - PubMed
    1. Broderick GA. Evidence based assessment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10(Suppl. 2):S64–S73. discussion S77–S69. - PubMed
    1. Brown MW, Brooks JP, Albert PS, et al. An analysis of erectile function after intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate carcinoma. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10:189–193. - PubMed

Publication types