Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S135-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.093.

Accurate accumulation of dose for improved understanding of radiation effects in normal tissue

Affiliations
Review

Accurate accumulation of dose for improved understanding of radiation effects in normal tissue

David A Jaffray et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

The actual distribution of radiation dose accumulated in normal tissues over the complete course of radiation therapy is, in general, poorly quantified. Differences in the patient anatomy between planning and treatment can occur gradually (e.g., tumor regression, resolution of edema) or relatively rapidly (e.g., bladder filling, breathing motion) and these undermine the accuracy of the planned dose distribution. Current efforts to maximize the therapeutic ratio require models that relate the true accumulated dose to clinical outcome. The needed accuracy can only be achieved through the development of robust methods that track the accumulation of dose within the various tissues in the body. Specific needs include the development of segmentation methods, tissue-mapping algorithms, uncertainty estimation, optimal schedules for image-based monitoring, and the development of informatics tools to support subsequent analysis. These developments will not only improve radiation outcomes modeling but will address the technical demands of the adaptive radiotherapy paradigm. The next 5 years need to see academia and industry bring these tools into the hands of the clinician and the clinical scientist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None.

References

    1. Kutcher GJ, Mageras GS, Leibel SA. Control, correction, and modeling of setup errors and organ motion. Seminars in Radiation Oncology. 1996;5:134. - PubMed
    1. Langen KM, Jones DT. Organ motion and its management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:265–278. - PubMed
    1. Keall PJ, Beckham WA, Booth JT, et al. A method to predict the effect of organ motion and set-up variations on treatment plans. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1999;22:48–52. - PubMed
    1. Yan D, Jaffray DA, Wong JW. A model to accumulate fractionated dose in a deforming organ. Med Phys. 1999;44:665. - PubMed
    1. Bos LJ, van der Geer J, van Herk M, et al. The sensitivity of dose distributions for organ motion and set-up uncertainties in prostate IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2005;76:18–26. - PubMed