Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr;183(4):1360-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point

Andrew Vickers  1 , Fernando Bianco, Angel Cronin, James Eastham, Eric Klein, Michael Kattan, Peter Scardino
Affiliations
Comparative Study

The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point

Andrew Vickers et al. J Urol. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical margin status is commonly used as an end point for surgical learning. We examined the surgical margin learning curve and investigated whether surgical margins are a good marker for oncological outcome.

Materials and methods: The study cohort included 7,765 patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy by 1 of 72 surgeons at a total of 4 major American academic medical centers. We calculated the learning curve for surgical margins and a concordance probability between the surgeon rates of positive surgical margins and 5-year biochemical recurrence.

Results: A positive surgical margin was identified in 2,059 patients (27%). On multivariate analysis surgeon experience was strongly associated with surgical margin status (p = 0.017). The probability of a positive surgical margin was 40% for a surgeon with 10 prior cases, which decreased to 25% for a surgeon with 250 (absolute difference 15%, 95% CI 11 to 18). Learning curves differed dramatically among surgeons. For surgeon pairs the surgeon with the superior positive surgical margin rate also had the better biochemical recurrence rate only 58% of the time.

Conclusions: We noted a learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy. The poor concordance between surgeon margin and recurrence rates suggests that while margins clearly matter and efforts should be made to decrease positive margin rates, surgical margin status is not a strong surrogate for cancer control. These results have implications for using the margin rate to evaluate changes in surgical technique and as surgeon feedback.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The surgical learning curve for a positive surgical margin
Predicted probability (black curve) and 95% confidence intervals (gray curves) of a positive surgical margin are plotted against increasing surgical experience. Probabilities are for a patient with typical cancer severity (mean prostate-specific antigen level, pathologic stage, and grade) treated in 1997 (approximately equal numbers of patients were treated before and after 1997).
Figure 2
Figure 2. The surgical learning curve for a positive surgical margin, stratified by presence of organ-confined disease
Predicted probability and 95% confidence intervals (organ confined: black curves; non-organ confined: gray curves) of a positive surgical margin are plotted against increasing surgical experience. Probabilities are for a patient with typical cancer severity (mean prostate-specific antigen level, pathologic stage, and grade) within each group, treated in 1997 (approximately equal numbers of patients were treated before and after 1997).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Learning curve for positive surgical margins, separately by surgeon, for those who performed at least 250 cases
Figure 4
Figure 4. Scatter plot of adjusted probability of 5-year biochemical recurrence versus adjusted probability of positive surgical margins
Each circle represents a single surgeon, and the size of the circle is proportional to the number of patients treated by that surgeon.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171. - PubMed
    1. Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:475. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eggleston JC, Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases. J Urol. 1985;134:1146. - PubMed
    1. Kaul S, Savera A, Badani K, et al. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int. 2006;97:467. - PubMed
    1. Ruiz L, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Eur Urol. 2004;46:50. - PubMed

Publication types