Reliability, stability, and sensitivity to change and impairment in acoustic measures of timing and frequency

Abstract

Assessment of the voice for supporting classifications of central nervous system (CNS) impairment requires a different practical, methodological, and statistical framework compared with assessment of the voice to guide decisions about change in the CNS. In experimental terms, an understanding of the stability and sensitivity to change of an assessment protocol is required to guide decisions about CNS change. Five experiments (N = 70) were conducted using a set of commonly used stimuli (eg, sustained vowel, reading, extemporaneous speech) and easily acquired measures (eg, f₀-f₄, percent pause). Stability of these measures was examined through their repeated application in healthy adults over brief and intermediate retest intervals (ie, 30 seconds, 2 hours, and 1 week). Those measures found to be stable were then challenged using an experimental model that reliably changes voice acoustic properties (ie, the Lombard effect). Finally, adults with an established CNS-related motor speech disorder (dysarthria) were compared with healthy controls. Of the 61 acoustic variables studied, 36 showed good stability over all three stability experiments (eg, number of pauses, total speech time, speech rate, f₀-f₄. Of the measures with good stability, a number of frequency measures showed a change in response to increased vocal effort resulting from the Lombard effect challenge. Furthermore, several timing measures significantly separated the control and motor speech impairment groups. Measures with high levels of stability within healthy adults, and those that show sensitivity to change and impairment may prove effective for monitoring changes in CNS functioning.