Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;21(1 Suppl):71-94.
doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0264.

Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women

Affiliations

Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women

Alecia Malin Fair et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

This article targets the relationship between psychosocial determinants and abnormal screening mammography follow-up in a medically underserved population. Health belief scales were modified to refer to diagnostic follow-up versus annual screening. A retrospective cohort study design was used. Statistical analyses were performed examining relationships among sociodemographic factors, psychosocial determinants, and abnormal mammography follow-up. Women with lower mean internal health locus of control scores (3.14) were two times more likely than women with higher mean internal health locus of control scores (3.98) to have inadequate follow-up (OR=2.53, 95% CI=1.12-5.36). Women with less than a high school education had lower cancer fatalism scores than women who had completed high school (47.5 vs. 55.2, p-value=.02) and lower mean external health locus of control scores (3.0 vs. 5.3) (p-value<.01). These constructs have implications for understanding mammography follow-up among minority and medically underserved women. Further comprehensive study of these concepts is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blackman DJ, Masi CM. Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality: are we doing enough to address the root causes? J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 10;24(14):2170–2178. - PubMed
    1. Albano JD, Ward E, Jemal A, et al. Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 19;99(18):1384–1394. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2009. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2009. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf.
    1. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Kraphcho M. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2005. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2009. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/.
    1. Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, et al. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA. 1994 Sep 28;272(12):947–954. - PubMed

Publication types