Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey
- PMID: 20173646
- DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283352ced
Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey
Abstract
Background and aim: Data about small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) come from studies involving small and highly selected populations. The study aim was to describe extent of use, indications, results, complications, and practical issues of SBCE in clinical practice in a Northern Italian Region (Lombardia).
Materials and methods: Twenty-three out of 29 invited centers fulfilled a specific questionnaire.
Results: Between 2001 and 2008, 2921 procedures were performed and both the number of centers performing SBCE (from 5 to 29) and the number of SBCE (from 7.2 to 69.2 per month) increased steadily. The main indications for SBCE were: obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) (43.4%), unexplained anemia (23.9%), suspected Crohn's disease (7.8%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). Overall, SBCE was positive in 50% of cases, negative in 36% and undefined in 14%. The highest diagnostic yields were observed in patients with OGIB (62.5%), polypoid syndromes (74.1%), known (54.8%) or suspected (47.3%) inflammatory bowel disease, while the yields were low in patients examined for chronic diarrhea (27.4%) and abdominal pain (14.9%), 61 patients (2.1%) experienced capsule retention. Thirty-two of them eventually excreted the capsule naturally while endoscopic or surgical retrieval was necessary in 29 (1%) (in two because of obstruction).
Conclusion: Over a period of 7 years the use of SBCE in Lombardia increased steadily confirming, in clinical practice, a high diagnostic yield and an acceptable safety profile.
Similar articles
-
Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel.Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;26(2):129-33. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328334df17. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20145540 Review.
-
Can we predict spontaneous capsule passage after retention? A nationwide study to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention.Endoscopy. 2007 Dec;39(12):1046-52. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966978. Endoscopy. 2007. PMID: 18072054
-
Small bowel video capsule endoscopy: an overview.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;7(4):323-9. doi: 10.1586/egh.13.20. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23639090 Review.
-
Capsule endoscopy: technique and indications.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(5):813-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2008.06.003. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18790434 Review.
-
Capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy: modern modalities to investigate the small bowel in paediatrics.Arch Dis Child. 2008 Feb;93(2):154-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.125369. Epub 2007 Sep 6. Arch Dis Child. 2008. PMID: 17823217 Review.
Cited by
-
Patency testing improves capsule retention rates but at what cost? A retrospective look at patency testing.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 9;10:1046155. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1046155. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37621464 Free PMC article.
-
Tracheal aspiration of capsule endoscopes: completing a cases compilation.Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Oct;56(10):3101-2. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1704-0. Dig Dis Sci. 2011. PMID: 21516324 No abstract available.
-
Capsule retentions and incomplete capsule endoscopy examinations: an analysis of 2300 examinations.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:518718. doi: 10.1155/2012/518718. Epub 2011 Sep 29. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012. PMID: 21969823 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a computed cleansing score to assess quality of bowel preparation in colon capsule endoscopy.Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jul;6(7):E844-E850. doi: 10.1055/a-0577-2897. Epub 2018 Jul 4. Endosc Int Open. 2018. PMID: 29978004 Free PMC article.
-
Capsule retention: prevention, diagnosis and management.Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(9):198. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.15. Ann Transl Med. 2017. PMID: 28567378 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical