Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study
- PMID: 20174838
- PMCID: PMC2899955
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1319-8
Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study
Abstract
Anterior decompression and fusion is an established procedure in surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). However, contiguous corpectomies and fusion (CCF) often induce postoperative complications such as nonunion, graft subsidence, and loss of lordotic alignment. As an alternative, noncontiguous corpectomies or one-level corpectomy plus adjacent-level discectomy with retention of an intervening body has been developed recently. In this study, we prospectively compared noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion (NADF) and CCF for MCSM in terms of surgical invasiveness, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications. From January 2005 to June 2007, 105 patients with MCSM were randomized to NADF group (n = 55) and CCF group (n = 50), and followed up for average 31.5 months (range 24-48 months). Average operative time and blood loss decreased significantly in the NADF group as compared with those in the CCF group (p < 0.05 and <0.001, respectively). For VAS, within 3 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. But at 6 months after surgery and final follow-up, VAS improved significantly in NADF group than that in CCF group (p < 0.05). No significant difference of JOA score was observed between the two groups at every collection time. In NADF group, all 55 cases obtained fusion at 1 year after operation (average 5.1 months). In CCF group, 48 cases achieved fusion 1 year postoperatively, but the other 2 cases were performed posterior stabilization and achieved fusion 6 months later. The differences of cervical lordosis between two groups were insignificant at the same follow-up time. But the loss of lordosis and height of fusion segments in 6 months postoperatively and final follow-up were significantly more in CFF group than in NADF group (p < 0.001). Complications were similar in both groups. But in CCF group three cases needed reoperation, one case with extradural hematoma was immediately re-operated after anterior decompression and two cases mentioned above were performed posterior stabilization at 1 year postoperatively. In conclusion, in the patients with MCSM, without developmental stenosis and continuous or combined ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments, NADF and CCF showed an identical effect of decompression. In terms of surgical time, blood loss, VAS, fusion rate and cervical alignment, NADF was superior compared with CCF.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Posterior endoscopic decompression combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective case-control study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jul 15;24(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06713-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37454072 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 19850532
-
Selection of operative approaches for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy by imageological score.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Apr;25(2):99-106. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318211fc1d. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012. PMID: 21423059
-
Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2023 Jan-Apr;31(1):10225536231167704. doi: 10.1177/10225536231167704. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2023. PMID: 36972216 Review.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(49):e5437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005437. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27930523 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy.Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul;22(7):1594-602. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2741-5. Epub 2013 Mar 19. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23508336 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and a meta-analysis.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 29;11:161-70. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S72699. eCollection 2015. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015. PMID: 25673996 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus hybrid surgery in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(34):e11973. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011973. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30142827 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perioperative complications in patients treated with posterior cervical fusion and bilateral cages.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):342-349. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_61_17. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2017. PMID: 29403247 Free PMC article.
-
Hybrid decompression and reconstruction technique for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: case series and review of the literature.J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):181-195. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.08. J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32309656 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Acosta FL, Jr, Aryan HE, Chou D, Ames CP. Long-term biomechanical stability and clinical improvement after extended multilevel corpectomy and circumferential reconstruction of the cervical spine using titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(3):165–174. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180654205. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials