Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 20174950
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3
Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Patients and methods: Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS).
Results: Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups.
Conclusion: SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00872287.
Comment in
-
Adverse effects of misprints in randomized controlled studies as a source of metaanalysis.Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):3045-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2828-4. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23371023 No abstract available.
-
Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3: re: different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised trial (2010 (24):1842-1848) and doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1921-9: re: α-defensins and hsCRP levels in inflammatory response of standard and laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (2012 (26):627-631).Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):3052. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2834-6. Epub 2013 Feb 9. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23397505 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Preincisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine plus normal saline infusion for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):2036-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9762-x. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18270769 Clinical Trial.
-
Preincisional intravenous low-dose ketamine and local infiltration with ropivacaine reduces postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc. 2001 Sep;15(9):1030-3. doi: 10.1007/s004640090124. Epub 2001 Jun 12. Surg Endosc. 2001. PMID: 11443472 Clinical Trial.
-
Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1961-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9256-1. Epub 2003 Oct 28. Surg Endosc. 2003. PMID: 14577025 Clinical Trial.
-
A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy.J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1733-40. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0902-y. Epub 2009 May 2. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009. PMID: 19412642 Review.
-
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FOUR-PORT AND THE THREE-PORT TROCAR ACCESS AND THE SINGLE PORT ACCESS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY--REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2014;(4):47-56. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 2014. PMID: 26152065 Review. Bulgarian, English.
Cited by
-
Robotic single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.J Robot Surg. 2012 Sep;6(3):273-4. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0310-7. Epub 2011 Oct 22. J Robot Surg. 2012. PMID: 22956983 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of single port access colorectal surgery: a single institutional case-matched study.J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):629-34. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1780-7. Epub 2011 Nov 29. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012. PMID: 22125169
-
Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients.World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):991-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1946-4. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23435700 Clinical Trial.
-
Fundus-first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a cholangiogram: a feasibility study.Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):954-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1240-6. Epub 2010 Aug 19. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20721587 Clinical Trial.
-
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and overweight patients.Obes Surg. 2014 Jan;24(1):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1041-9. Obes Surg. 2014. PMID: 23929313
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical