Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 20174950
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3
Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Patients and methods: Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS).
Results: Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups.
Conclusion: SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov ).
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00872287.
Comment in
-
Adverse effects of misprints in randomized controlled studies as a source of metaanalysis.Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):3045-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2828-4. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23371023 No abstract available.
-
Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3: re: different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised trial (2010 (24):1842-1848) and doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1921-9: re: α-defensins and hsCRP levels in inflammatory response of standard and laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (2012 (26):627-631).Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):3052. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2834-6. Epub 2013 Feb 9. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23397505 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical