Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;20(6):768-75.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0095-1. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

The effect of duodenal-jejunal bypass on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion in Wistar rats

Affiliations

The effect of duodenal-jejunal bypass on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion in Wistar rats

Tammy L Kindel et al. Obes Surg. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Enteroendocrine K cells secrete the incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and are predominately located in the duodenum. GIP levels should decrease after gastric bypass due to duodenal exclusion; however, studies have found conflicting data regarding the changes in GIP secretion after gastric bypass and duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB).

Methods: We performed a DJB or Sham surgery on Wistar rats followed by an oral glucose tolerance test on postoperative (post-op) day 12 and superior mesenteric lymphatic cannulation on post-op day 14. We measured meal-stimulated GIP concentrations and small bowel GIP and GLP-1 protein content after DJB or Sham surgery.

Results: There was no difference in glucose tolerance by 12 days post-op. We found no difference in lymphatic GIP concentration area under the curve between DJB and Sham rats (15,240 pg/ml min +/- 2,651 vs. 17,201 pg/ml min +/- 2,763, respectively, p = 0.62). GIP and GLP-1 protein contents were both significantly increased only in the midjejunum in DJB rats compared to Sham rats (p = 0.009 and p = 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions: Plasma and lymphatic GIP concentrations did not significantly change after DJB in Wistar rats. DJB increased GIP protein content in the midjejunum at the new site of nutrient absorption, but this was surprisingly not countered by a decrease in GIP protein content in the bypassed duodenum. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms that account for the discrepancy in GIP production and subsequent secretion after DJB as well as what role GIP plays in the effect of gastrointestinal surgery on glucose homeostasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Body weight and food intake after gastrointestinal surgery in Wistar rats. Body weights (a) and food intake (b) were assessed daily preoperatively and for 2 weeks postoperatively. *p<0.05, statistically different between the two surgical groups. Data are presented as mean±SE
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
An oral glucose tolerance test (2 g/kg D-glucose) was performed 12 days after DJB or Sham surgery. Plasma glucose concentrations (a) and insulin concentrations (c) were measured at fasting and 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after the glucose gavage. Glucose concentration AUC (b) and insulin concentration AUC (d) were determined using the trapezoidal rule. Data are presented as mean±SE
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Total GIP concentrations were measured from plasma or gastrointestinal lymph (a) at fasting and for 1 h following the administration of a mixed meal (7.68 ml/kg Ensure). Plasma and lymphatic GIP concentration AUC (b) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Data are presented as mean±SE
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage intestinal GIP (a) or GLP-1 protein content (b) was determined at 2 weeks after DJB or Sham surgery in Wistar rats. Intestinal segments were taken from the duodenum, proximal jejunum (distal to the duodenojejunostomy in DJB rats or 10 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz in Sham rats), midjejunum (distal to the jejujejunostomy in DJB rats or 25 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz in Sham rats), and distal ileum. *p<0.05, statistically different for the tested segment of small bowel between DJB and Sham rats. Data are presented as mean±SE

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222:339–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schauer PR, Burguera B, Ikramuddin S, et al. Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2003;238:467–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sjöström CD, Lissner L, Wedel H, et al. Reduction in incidence of diabetes, hypertension, and lipid disturbances after intentional weight loss induced by bariatric surgery: the SOS Intervention Study. Obes Res. 1999;7:477–84. - PubMed
    1. Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. NEJM. 2004;351:2683–93. - PubMed
    1. Nauck MA, Bartels E, Orskov C, et al. Additive insulinotropic effects of exogenous synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide infused at near-physiological insulinotropic hormone and glucose concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76:912–7. - PubMed

Publication types