Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information
- PMID: 20177902
- DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0277-4
Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests humans optimally weight visual and haptic information (i.e., in inverse proportion to their variances). A more recent proposal is that spatial information (i.e., distance and direction) may also adhere to Bayesian principles and be weighted in an optimal fashion. A fundamental assumption of this proposal is that participants encode the variability of spatial information. In a three-dimensional virtual-environment open-field search task, we provide evidence that participants encoded the variability of landmark-based spatial information. Specifically, participants searched for a hidden goal location in a 5 × 5 matrix of raised bins. Participants experienced five training phases in which they searched for a hidden goal that maintained a unique spatial relationship to each of four distinct landmarks. Each landmark was assigned an a priori value of locational uncertainty such that each varied in its ability to predict a goal (i.e., varied in number of potential goal locations). Following training, participants experienced conflict trials in which two distinct landmarks were presented simultaneously. Participants preferentially responded to the landmark with the lower uncertainty value (i.e., smaller number of potential goal locations). Results provide empirical evidence for the encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information and have implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.
Similar articles
-
Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1857-1871. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000416. Epub 2017 May 15. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017. PMID: 28504533
-
Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):341-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0283-3. Epub 2009 Sep 24. Anim Cogn. 2010. PMID: 19777275
-
Use of a geometric rule or absolute vectors: landmark use by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana).Brain Res Bull. 2008 Jun 15;76(3):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Mar 3. Brain Res Bull. 2008. PMID: 18498944
-
Spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures: comparative and developmental perspectives.Cogn Process. 2008 Dec;9(4):229-38. doi: 10.1007/s10339-008-0202-6. Epub 2008 Jan 15. Cogn Process. 2008. PMID: 18196304 Review.
-
What is geometric information and how do animals use it?Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):339-43. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Nov 24. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19084055 Review.
Cited by
-
Super-optimality and relative distance coding in location memory.Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1439-1450. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01553-4. Epub 2024 Mar 22. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 38519780
-
Flash-lag effect: complicating motion extrapolation of the moving reference-stimulus paradoxically augments the effect.Psychol Res. 2012 Sep;76(5):654-66. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0370-3. Epub 2011 Aug 5. Psychol Res. 2012. PMID: 21818621
-
MnemoCity Task: Assessment of Childrens Spatial Memory Using Stereoscopy and Virtual Environments.PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161858. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27579715 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence consistent with the multiple-bearings hypothesis from human virtual landmark-based navigation.Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 28;6:488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00488. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25972823 Free PMC article.
-
Augmented reality for the assessment of children's spatial memory in real settings.PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e113751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113751. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25438146 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources