Performance of EUS-FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy: impact on patient management and costs in low-volume EUS centers
- PMID: 20177920
- PMCID: PMC2939341
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0946-9
Performance of EUS-FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy: impact on patient management and costs in low-volume EUS centers
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of mediastinal lymphadenopathy has been shown to be a valuable diagnostic tool in high-volume EUS centers (≥ 50 mediastinal EUS-FNA/endoscopist/year). Our goal was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA and its impact on clinical management and costs in low-volume EUS centers (<50 mediastinal EUS-FNA/endoscopist/year).
Methods: Consecutive patients referred to two Dutch endoscopy centers in the period 2002-2008 for EUS-FNA of mediastinal lymphadenopathy were reviewed. The gold standard for a cytological diagnosis was histological confirmation or clinical follow-up of more than 6 months with repeat imaging. The impact of EUS-FNA on clinical management was subdivided into a positive impact by providing (1) adequate cytology that influenced the decision to perform surgery or (2) a diagnosis of a benign inflammatory disorder, and a negative impact which was subdivided into (1) false-negative or inconclusive cytology or (2) an adequate cytological diagnosis that did not influence patient management. Costs of an alternative diagnostic work-up without EUS-FNA, as established by an expert panel, were compared to costs of the actual work-up.
Results: In total, 213 patients (71% male, median age= 61 years, range = 23-88 years) underwent EUS-FNA. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were 89%, 100%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. EUS-FNA had a positive impact on clinical management in 84% of cases by either influencing the decision to perform surgery (49%) or excluding malignant lymphadenopathy (35%), and a negative impact in 7% of cases because of inadequate (3%) or false-negative (4%) cytology. In 9% of cases, EUS-FNA was performed without an established indication. Two nonfatal perforations occurred (0.9%). Total cost reduction was €100,593, with a mean cost reduction of €472 (SD = €607) per patient.
Conclusions: Mediastinal EUS-FNA can be performed in low-volume EUS centers without compromising diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, EUS-FNA plays an important role in the management of patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and reduces total diagnostic costs.
Figures
Similar articles
-
EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in mediastinal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology.Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):863-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124637. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002. PMID: 12024142
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of suspected tuberculosis in patients with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy.Endoscopy. 2010 Jun;42(6):462-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244133. Epub 2010 Apr 29. Endoscopy. 2010. PMID: 20432206 Clinical Trial.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration when combined with positron emission tomography improves specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy in unexplained mediastinal lymphadenopathy and staging of non-small-cell lung cancer.Intern Med J. 2008 Nov;38(11):837-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01670.x. Intern Med J. 2008. PMID: 19120534
-
Endoscopic ultrasound: it's accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review.World J Gastroenterol. 2008 May 21;14(19):3028-37. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3028. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18494054 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is superior to lymph node echofeatures: a prospective evaluation of mediastinal and peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy.Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Apr;99(4):628-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04064.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15089893 Review.
Cited by
-
Complications of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;10(11):964. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10110964. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33213103 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications.World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 14;18(34):4659-76. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i34.4659. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23002335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Performance of EUS-FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy: impact on patient management and costs in low-volume EUS centers.Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):3124-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1648-7. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21455804 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Practical approach to linear EUS examination of the mediastinum.Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Nov-Dec;10(6):406-413. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00019. Endosc Ultrasound. 2021. PMID: 34854401 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improved Accuracy and Sensitivity in Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer with Systematic and Combined Endobronchial and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EBUS-EUS): Experience from a Tertiary Center.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 9;16(4):728. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040728. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38398119 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Bobrowski C, Pforte A, Topalidis T, Krause C, Jaeckle S, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with or without previous malignancy: EUS-FNA-based differential cytodiagnosis in 153 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2278–2284. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02243.x. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical