Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 23:10:49.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-49.

Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people

Affiliations

Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people

Flora C G Douglas et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: This paper describes a study protocol designed to evaluate a programme of smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people living in urban and rural locations in Northeast Scotland. The study design was developed on so-called 'realist' evaluation principles, which are concerned with the implementation of interventions as well as their outcomes.

Methods/design: A two-phased study was designed based on the Theory of Change (TOC) using mixed methods to assess both process and outcome factors. The study was designed with input from the relevant stakeholders. The mixed-methods approach consists of semi-structured interviews with planners, service providers, service users and non-users. These qualitative interviews will be analysed using a thematic framework approach. The quantitative element of the study will include the analysis of routinely collected data and specific project monitoring data, such as data on service engagement, service use, quit rates and changes in smoking status.

Discussion: The process of involving key stakeholders was conducted using logic modelling and TOC tools. Engaging stakeholders, including those responsible for funding, developing and delivering, and those intended to benefit from interventions aimed at them, in their evaluation design, are considered by many to increase the validity and rigour of the subsequent evidence generated. This study is intended to determine not only the components and processes, but also the possible effectiveness of this set of health interventions, and contribute to the evidence base about smoking cessation interventions aimed at priority groups in Scotland. It is also anticipated that this study will contribute to the ongoing debate about the role and challenges of 'realist' evaluation approaches in general, and the utility of logic modelling and TOC approaches in particular, for evaluation of complex health interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scottish Executive. The Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Act 2005, Part 1. Edinburgh. 2005.
    1. Abma TA. Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contexts. Health Promotion International. 2005;20(4):391–397. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Judge K, Bauld L. Strong theory, flexible methods: evaluating complex community-based initiatives. Critical Public Health. 2001;11(1):20–38.
    1. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Sage Publications Inc; 1997.
    1. Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Potvin L, Springett J. In: A framework for health promotion evaluation. Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, et al, editor. Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and prespectives: World Health Organisation; 2001. pp. 7–38. - PubMed

Publication types