Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people
- PMID: 20178559
- PMCID: PMC2843700
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-49
Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people
Abstract
Background: This paper describes a study protocol designed to evaluate a programme of smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people living in urban and rural locations in Northeast Scotland. The study design was developed on so-called 'realist' evaluation principles, which are concerned with the implementation of interventions as well as their outcomes.
Methods/design: A two-phased study was designed based on the Theory of Change (TOC) using mixed methods to assess both process and outcome factors. The study was designed with input from the relevant stakeholders. The mixed-methods approach consists of semi-structured interviews with planners, service providers, service users and non-users. These qualitative interviews will be analysed using a thematic framework approach. The quantitative element of the study will include the analysis of routinely collected data and specific project monitoring data, such as data on service engagement, service use, quit rates and changes in smoking status.
Discussion: The process of involving key stakeholders was conducted using logic modelling and TOC tools. Engaging stakeholders, including those responsible for funding, developing and delivering, and those intended to benefit from interventions aimed at them, in their evaluation design, are considered by many to increase the validity and rigour of the subsequent evidence generated. This study is intended to determine not only the components and processes, but also the possible effectiveness of this set of health interventions, and contribute to the evidence base about smoking cessation interventions aimed at priority groups in Scotland. It is also anticipated that this study will contribute to the ongoing debate about the role and challenges of 'realist' evaluation approaches in general, and the utility of logic modelling and TOC approaches in particular, for evaluation of complex health interventions.
Similar articles
-
CATCH: development of a home-based midwifery intervention to support young pregnant smokers to quit.Midwifery. 2009 Oct;25(5):473-82. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 14. Midwifery. 2009. PMID: 18280015
-
Exploring the adequacy of smoking cessation support for pregnant and postpartum women.BMC Public Health. 2013 May 14;13:472. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-472. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23672201 Free PMC article.
-
Give It Up For Baby: outcomes and factors influencing uptake of a pilot smoking cessation incentive scheme for pregnant women.BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 15;13:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-343. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23587161 Free PMC article.
-
Adapting health promotion interventions to meet the needs of ethnic minority groups: mixed-methods evidence synthesis.Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(44):1-469. doi: 10.3310/hta16440. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 23158845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding for whom, under what conditions and how smoking cessation services for pregnant women in the United Kingdom work-a rapid realist review.BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):2488. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17378-w. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38087281 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Using mixed methods effectively in prevention science: designs, procedures, and examples.Prev Sci. 2014 Oct;15(5):654-62. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0415-5. Prev Sci. 2014. PMID: 23801237
-
Scaling-up digital follow-up care services: collaborative development and implementation of Remote Patient Monitoring pilot initiatives to increase access to follow-up care.Front Digit Health. 2022 Dec 7;4:1006447. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1006447. eCollection 2022. Front Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 36569802 Free PMC article.
-
Framework for Selecting Best Practices in Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review.J Public Health Res. 2015 Nov 17;4(3):577. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.577. eCollection 2015 Nov 17. J Public Health Res. 2015. PMID: 26753159 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda.Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):109. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017. PMID: 29297374 Free PMC article.
-
Teachers' perceptions of the differential impacts of a universal, school-based social and emotional learning intervention: A thematic framework analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0328482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328482. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40694550 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Scottish Executive. The Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Act 2005, Part 1. Edinburgh. 2005.
-
- Judge K, Bauld L. Strong theory, flexible methods: evaluating complex community-based initiatives. Critical Public Health. 2001;11(1):20–38.
-
- Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Sage Publications Inc; 1997.
-
- Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Potvin L, Springett J. In: A framework for health promotion evaluation. Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, et al, editor. Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and prespectives: World Health Organisation; 2001. pp. 7–38. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical