Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 23:11:17.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-17.

A systematic review of techniques and interventions for improving adherence to inclusion and exclusion criteria during enrolment into randomised controlled trials

Fiona Simpson  1 , Elizabeth A Sweetman, Gordon S Doig
Affiliations

A systematic review of techniques and interventions for improving adherence to inclusion and exclusion criteria during enrolment into randomised controlled trials

Fiona Simpson et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Enrolment of patients into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in violation of key inclusion or exclusion criteria, may lead to excess avoidable harm. The purpose of this paper was to systematically identify and review techniques and interventions proven to prevent or avoid inappropriate enrolment of patients into RCTs.

Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, online abstract repositories, and conference websites were searched. Experts were contacted and bibliographies of retrieved papers hand-searched. The search cut-off date was 31 August 2009.

Results: No primary publications were found. We identified one study in the grey literature (conference abstracts and presentations) reporting the results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of an intervention designed to prevent or avoid inappropriate enrolment of patients into an RCT. In the context of a multicentre trial, use of a dummy enrolment run-in phase was shown to reduce enrolment errors significantly (P < 0.001), from 16.1% during the run-in phase to < 1% after trial initiation.

Conclusions: Our systematic search yielded only one technique or intervention shown to improve adherence to eligibility criteria during enrolment into RCTs. Given the potential harm involved in recruiting patients into a clinical trial in violation of key eligibility criteria, future research is needed to better inform those conducting clinical trials of how best to prevent enrolment errors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The literature search study selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials. A Practical Approach. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 1983.
    1. Macias WL, Vallet B, Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, Nelson DR, Nelson DR, Derchak PA, Dhainaut JF. Sources of variability on the estimate of treatment effect in the PROWESS trial: implications for the design and conduct of future studies in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2385–2391. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000147440.71142.AC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sprung CL, Finch RG, Thijs LG, Glauser MP. International sepsis trial (INTERSEPT): role and impact of a clinical evaluation committee. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1441–1447. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199609000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Walter SD, Werre SR. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330:1179–1185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38446.498542.8F. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong SS, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94:41–47. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types