Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Feb 23:10:89.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-89.

Effectiveness of intensive group and individual interventions for smoking cessation in primary health care settings: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of intensive group and individual interventions for smoking cessation in primary health care settings: a randomized trial

Maria Ramos et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: Primary: To compare the effectiveness of intensive group and individual interventions for smoking cessation in a primary health care setting; secondary: to identify the variables associated with smoking cessation.

Methods: Three-pronged clinical trial with randomisation at the individual level. We performed the following: an intensive individual intervention (III), an intensive group intervention (IGI) and a minimal intervention (MI). Included in the study were smokers who were prepared to quit smoking. Excluded from the study were individuals aged less than 18 years or with severe mental conditions or terminal illnesses. The outcome measure was continued abstinence at 12 months confirmed through CO-oximetry (CO). The analysis was based on intention to treat.

Results: In total, 287 smokers were recruited: 81 in the III, 111 in the IGI, and 95 in the MI. Continued abstinence at 12 months confirmed through CO was 7.4% in the III, 5.4% in the IGI, and 1% in the MI. No significant differences were noted between III and MI on the one hand, and between IGI and MI on the other [RR 7.04 (0.9-7.2) and RR 5.1 (0.6-41.9), respectively]. No differences were noted between IGI and III [RR 0.7 (0.2-2.2)]. In multivariate analysis, only overall visit length showed a statistically significant association with smoking cessation.

Conclusions: The effectiveness of intensive smoking interventions in this study was lower than expected. No statistically significant differences were found between the results of individual and group interventions.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN32323770.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case flow.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banegas JR, Díaz L, González J, Villar F, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. La mortalidad atribuible al tabaquismo comienza a descender en España. Med Clin (Barc) 2005;124(20):769–71. doi: 10.1157/13075847. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stead lF, Bergson G, Lancaster T. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008. p. CD000165. - PubMed
    1. Hajek P. Treatments for smokers. Addiction. 1994;89:1543–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03756.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hughes JR. Motivating and helping smokers to stop smoking. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(12):1053–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20640.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le Foll B, George TP. Treatment of tobacco dependence: integrating recent progress into practice. CMAJ. 2007;177(11):1373–80. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data