Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;40(12):2049-57.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000206.

Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes

Affiliations

Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes

C R Brewin et al. Psychol Med. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how to remedy the unmet mental health needs associated with major terrorist attacks, or what outcomes are achievable with evidence-based treatment. This article reports the usage, diagnoses and outcomes associated with the 2-year Trauma Response Programme (TRP) for those affected by the 2005 London bombings.MethodFollowing a systematic and coordinated programme of outreach, the contact details of 910 people were obtained by the TRP. Of these, 596 completed a screening instrument that included the Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) and items assessing other negative responses. Those scoring ≥6 on the TSQ, or endorsing other negative responses, received a detailed clinical assessment. Individuals judged to need treatment (n=217) received trauma-focused cognitive-behaviour therapy (TF-CBT) or eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Symptom levels were assessed pre- and post-treatment with validated self-report measures of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, and 66 were followed up at 1 year.

Results: Case finding relied primarily on outreach rather than standard referral pathways such as primary care. The effect sizes achieved for treatment of DSM-IV PTSD exceeded those usually found in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and gains were well maintained an average of 1 year later.

Conclusions: Outreach with screening, linked to the provision of evidence-based treatment, seems to be a viable method of identifying and meeting mental health needs following a terrorist attack. Given the failure of normal care pathways, it is a potentially important approach that merits further evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of participants through screening and treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. Cognitive Therapy of Depression. Guilford Press; New York: 1979.
    1. Brewin CR. Cognitive and emotional reactions to traumatic events: implications for short-term intervention. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine. 2001;17:163–168. - PubMed
    1. Brewin CR. Systematic review of screening instruments for the detection of posttraumatic stress disorder in adults. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2005;18:53–62. - PubMed
    1. Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD. Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000;68:748–766. - PubMed
    1. Brewin CR Fuchkan N Huntley Z 2009Evaluation of the NHS Trauma Response to the London Bombings (MRD 12/98). Final Report to the Department of Health Forensic Mental Health R&D Programme. Department of Health; London

Publication types

MeSH terms