Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention
- PMID: 20178921
- DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000014
Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention
Abstract
Does the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory (VSTM) require sustained focused attention? This issue was investigated in three experiments, in which memory for single features (i.e., colors or shapes) was compared with memory for feature bindings (i.e., the link between the color and shape of an object). Attention was manipulated during the memory retention interval with a retro-cue, which allows attention to be directed and focused on a subset of memory items. The retro-cue was presented 700 ms after the offset of the memory display and 700 ms before the onset of the test display. If the maintenance of feature bindings - but not of individual features - in memory requires sustained focused attention, the retro-cue should not affect memory performance. Contrary to this prediction, we found that both memory for feature bindings and memory for individual features were equally improved by the retro-cue. Therefore, this finding does not support the view that the sustained focused attention is needed to properly maintain feature bindings in VSTM.
Similar articles
-
Setting and changing feature priorities in visual short-term memory.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):453-458. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1094-6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 27325056
-
Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults.Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016;23(2):184-95. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1069253. Epub 2015 Jul 24. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26208404 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:1-10. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12574. Epub 2014 Nov 26. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015. PMID: 25428708 Clinical Trial.
-
Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):1880-1889. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01761-0. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019. PMID: 31114955 Review.
-
In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):1839-60. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016. PMID: 27098647 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrieval from long-term memory reduces working memory representations for visual features and their bindings.Mem Cognit. 2015 Feb;43(2):237-46. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0468-0. Mem Cognit. 2015. PMID: 25301564
-
The binding of negative emotional stimuli with spatial information in working memory: A possible role for the episodic buffer.Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 22;17:1112805. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1112805. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37034170 Free PMC article.
-
The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory.Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1411-1422. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0738-8. Mem Cognit. 2017. PMID: 28741251
-
The role of attention in retaining the binding of integral features in working memory.J Vis. 2020 Jul 1;20(7):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.7.16. J Vis. 2020. PMID: 32687552 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of sequential attention shifts within visual working memory.Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 4;5:965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00965. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25237306 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources