Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 1;16(5):1358-67.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2398. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

Testing clonal relatedness of tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization: a statistical challenge

Affiliations

Testing clonal relatedness of tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization: a statistical challenge

Irina Ostrovnaya et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

In recent years several investigative groups have sought to use array technologies that characterize somatic alterations in tumors, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (ACGH), to classify pairs of tumors from the same patients as either independent primary cancers or metastases. A wide variety of strategies have been proposed. Several groups have endeavored to use hierarchical clustering for this purpose. This technique was popularized in genomics as a means of finding clusters of patients with similar gene expression patterns with a view to finding subcategories of tumors with distinct clinical characteristics. Unfortunately, this method is not well suited to the problem of classifying individual pairs of tumors as either clonal or independent. In this article we show why hierarchical clustering is unsuitable for this purpose, and why this method has the paradoxical property of producing a declining probability that clonal tumor pairs will be correctly identified as more information is accrued (i.e., more patients). We discuss alternative strategies that have been proposed, which are based on more conventional conceptual formulations for statistical testing and diagnosis, and point to the remaining challenges in constructing valid and robust techniques for this problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Example of a segmented copy number array (Tumor 4a)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Histograms of the LR similarity measure. The red hatched histogram plots the likelihood ratios of the tumor pairs from individual patients. The black histogram is a reference histogram for independent tumor pairs, created by calculating the likelihood ratios from all possible pairs of tumors from different patients.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Example of definitively clonal matching arrays from two tumors from patient 14 in the lung dataset (50). Notice the closely matching losses on 1p, 3p, 6q and 22q.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Dendrogram of the LR similarity measure. The 6 tumors pairs identified as clonally related by this method are highlighted by the bold rectangles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huang J, Behrens C, Wistuba I, Gazdar AF, Jagirdar J. Molecular analysis of synchronous and metachronous tumors of the lung: impact on management and prognosis. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2001;5:321–329. - PubMed
    1. Dacic S, Ionescu DN, Finkelstein S, Yousem SA. Patterns of allelic loss of synchronous adenocarcinomas of the lung. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:897–902. - PubMed
    1. Geurts TW, Nederlof PM, van den Brekel MW, et al. Pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma following head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: metastasis or second primary? Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6608–6614. - PubMed
    1. Leong PP, Rezai B, Koch WM, et al. Distinguishing second primary tumors from lung metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:972–977. - PubMed
    1. Hiroshima K, Toyozaki T, Kohno H, Ohwada H, Fujisawa T. Synchronous and metachronous lung carcinomas: molecular evidence for multicentricity. Pathol Int. 1998;48:869–876. - PubMed

Publication types