Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation
- PMID: 20179285
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.181
Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation
Erratum in
- JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1257
- JAMA. 2011 Jun 1;305(21):2174
-
Error in a study of the comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery stent implantation.JAMA. 2011 Jun 1;305(21):2172-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.709. Epub 2011 May 11. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21562204 No abstract available.
Abstract
Context High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with atherothrombotic events following coronary stent implantation. Objective To evaluate the capability of multiple platelet function tests to predict clinical outcome. Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective, observational, single-center cohort study of 1069 consecutive patients taking clopidogrel undergoing elective coronary stent implantation between December 2005 and December 2007. On-treatment platelet reactivity was measured in parallel by light transmittance aggregometry, Verify Now P2Y12 and Platelet works assays, and the IMPACT-R and the platelet function analysis system (PFA-100) (with the Dade PFA collagen/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) cartridge and Innovance PFA P2Y). Cutoff values for high on-treatment platelet reactivity were established by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Main Outcome Measurement The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point included TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) criteria major and minor bleeding. Results Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that at 1-year follow-up, the primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity when assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (52 [11.7%; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 8.9%-15.0%] vs 36 [6.0%;95%CI, 4.2%-8.2%] P.001; n=1049),Verify Now (54 [13.3%; 95% CI, 10.2%-17.0%] vs 37 [5.7%; 95% CI, 4.1%-7.8%]P.001; n=1052), Platelet works (33 [12.6%; 95% CI, 8.8%-17.2%] vs 21 [6.1%;95% CI, 3.8%-9.2%] P=.005; n=606), and Innovance PFA P2Y (18 [12.2%; 95%CI; 7.4%-18.6%] vs 28 [6.3%; 95% CI, 4.3%-8.9%] P=.02; n=588). ROC-curve analysis demonstrated that light transmittance aggregometry (area under the curve[AUC], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), Verify Now (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.57-0.67), and Platelet works (AUC, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.69) had modest ability to discriminate between patients with and without primary end point at 1-year follow-up. The IMPACT-R(n=905) and the Siemens PFA Collagen/ADP (n=812) were unable to discriminate between patients with and without the primary end point at 1-year follow-up (all AUCs included 0.50 in the CI). None of the tests identified patients at risk for bleeding. Conclusions Of the platelet function tests assessed, light transmittance aggregometry,Verify Now, Platelet works, and Innovance PFA P2Y were significantly associated with the primary end point. However, the predictive accuracy of these 4 tests was only modest. None of the tests provided accurate prognostic information to identify patients at higher risk of bleeding following stent implantation. Trial Registration clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT00352014 [corrected].
Similar articles
-
High residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading and long-term cardiovascular events among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI.JAMA. 2011 Sep 21;306(11):1215-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1332. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21934054
-
High on-treatment platelet reactivity to both aspirin and clopidogrel is associated with the highest risk of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention.Heart. 2011 Jun;97(12):983-90. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.220491. Epub 2011 Apr 8. Heart. 2011. PMID: 21478385 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical relevance of clopidogrel unresponsiveness during elective coronary stenting: experience with the point-of-care platelet function assay-100 C/ADP.Am Heart J. 2010 Mar;159(3):434-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.020. Am Heart J. 2010. PMID: 20211306
-
Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2261-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101. Epub 2013 Sep 27. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24076493
-
Towards 50 years of platelet function analyser (PFA) testing.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Jul 21;61(5):851-860. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0666. Print 2023 Apr 25. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022. PMID: 35859143 Review.
Cited by
-
Surface Engineering of Bioactive Coatings for Improved Stent Hemocompatibility: A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 29;16(21):6940. doi: 10.3390/ma16216940. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37959540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clopidogrel hyper-response and bleeding risk in neurointerventional procedures.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Apr;34(4):721-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3418. Epub 2012 Dec 28. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013. PMID: 23275598 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention.J Cell Mol Med. 2010 Oct;14(10):2371-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01162.x. J Cell Mol Med. 2010. PMID: 20738445 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differences in Optimal Platelet Reactivity after Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 28;11(9):2480. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092480. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35566604 Free PMC article.
-
ADP Platelet Hyperreactivity Predicts Cardiovascular Disease in the FHS (Framingham Heart Study).J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 3;7(5):e008522. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008522. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29502103 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical