High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening
- PMID: 20179689
- DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.51
High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Objectives: Flat and depressed colon neoplasms are an increasingly recognized precursor for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Western populations. High-definition chromoscopy is used to increase the yield of colonoscopy for flat and depressed neoplasms; however, its role in average-risk patients undergoing routine screening remains uncertain.
Methods: Average-risk patients referred for screening colonoscopy at four U.S. medical centers were randomized to high-definition chromocolonoscopy or high-definition white light colonoscopy. The primary outcomes, patients with at least one adenoma and the number of adenomas per patient, were compared between the two groups. The secondary outcome was patients with flat or depressed neoplasms, as defined by the Paris classification.
Results: A total of 660 patients were randomized (chromocolonoscopy: 321, white light: 339). Overall, the mean number of adenomas per patient was 1.2+/-2.1, the mean number of flat polyps per patient was 1.4+/-1.9, and the mean number of flat adenomas per patient was 0.5+/-1.0. The number of patients with at least one adenoma (55.5% vs. 48.4%, absolute difference 7.1%, 95% confidence interval (-0.5% to 14.7%), P=0.07), and the number of adenomas per patient (1.3+/-2.4 vs. 1.1+/-1.8, P=0.07) were marginally higher in the chromocolonoscopy group. There were no significant differences in the number of advanced adenomas per patient (0.06+/-0.37 vs. 0.04+/-0.25, P=0.3) and the number of advanced adenomas<10 mm per patient (0.02+/-0.26 vs. 0.01+/-0.14, P=0.4). Two invasive cancers were found, one in each group; neither was a flat neoplasm. Chromocolonoscopy detected significantly more flat adenomas per patient (0.6+/-1.2 vs. 0.4+/-0.9, P=0.01), adenomas<5 mm in diameter per patient (0.8+/-1.3 vs. 0.7+/-1.1, P=0.03), and non-neoplastic lesions per patient (1.8+/-2.3 vs. 1.0+/-1.3, P<0.0001).
Conclusions: High-definition chromocolonoscopy marginally increased overall adenoma detection, and yielded a modest increase in flat adenoma and small adenoma detection, compared with high-definition white light colonoscopy. The yield for advanced neoplasms was similar for the two methods. Our findings do not support the routine use of high-definition chromocolonoscopy for CRC screening in average-risk patients. The high adenoma detection rates observed in this study may be due to the high-definition technology used in both groups.
Comment in
-
An advanced chromocolonoscopic picture is worth a thousand words, but is it worth the effort?Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1308-10. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.44. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20523314
Similar articles
-
Chromocolonoscopy detects more adenomas than white light colonoscopy or narrow band imaging colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening.Endoscopy. 2009 Apr;41(4):316-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119628. Epub 2009 Apr 1. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19340735
-
Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate?Endoscopy. 2006 May;38(5):444-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925265. Endoscopy. 2006. PMID: 16767577 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.055. Epub 2010 May 20. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20493487 Clinical Trial.
-
Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):353-65. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995. PMID: 7872270 Review.
-
High-definition and filter-aided colonoscopy.Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010 Dec;39(4):859-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2010.08.022. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 21093760 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of different subtypes of serrated polyps and risk of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk population undergoing first-time colonoscopy.Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan 5;3(1):e6. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2011.5. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23238028 Free PMC article.
-
CF290 for pancolonic chromoendoscopy improved sessile serrated polyp detection and procedure time: a propensity score-matching study.Endosc Int Open. 2019 Aug;7(8):E987-E993. doi: 10.1055/a-0953-1909. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Endosc Int Open. 2019. PMID: 31367679 Free PMC article.
-
A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):130-135. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.3.18512. Epub 2011 Jul 1. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 22163084 Free PMC article.
-
Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.Cancer Med. 2013 Jun;2(3):391-402. doi: 10.1002/cam4.73. Epub 2013 Apr 20. Cancer Med. 2013. PMID: 23930215 Free PMC article.
-
Serrated polyps: clinical implications and future directions.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013 Sep;15(9):342. doi: 10.1007/s11894-013-0342-4. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23934652 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical