Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;38(5):695-706.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9395-0.

Deficits in attention to emotional stimuli distinguish youth with severe mood dysregulation from youth with bipolar disorder

Brendan A Rich  1 , Melissa A Brotman, Daniel P Dickstein, Derek G V Mitchell, R James R Blair, Ellen Leibenluft
Affiliations

Deficits in attention to emotional stimuli distinguish youth with severe mood dysregulation from youth with bipolar disorder

Brendan A Rich et al. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Studying attention in the context of emotional stimuli may aid in differentiating pediatric bipolar disorder (BD) from severe mood dysregulation (SMD). SMD is characterized by chronic irritability, arousal, and hyper-reactivity; SMD youth frequently receive a BD diagnosis although they do not meet DSM-IV criteria for BD because they lack manic episodes. We compared 57 BD (14.4 +/- 2.9 years old, 56% male), 41 SMD (12.6 +/- 2.6 years old, 66% male), and 33 control subjects (13.7 +/- 2.5 years old, 52% male) using the Emotional Interrupt task, which examines how attention is impacted by positive, negative, or neutral distracters. We compared reaction time (RT) and accuracy and calculated attention interference scores by subtracting performance on neutral trials from emotional trials. Between-group analyses indicated that SMD subjects had significantly reduced attention interference from emotional distracters relative to BD and control subjects. Thus, attention in SMD youth was not modulated by emotional stimuli. This blunted response in SMD youth may contribute to their affective and behavioral dysregulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Emotional Interrupt Task. Figure depicts the stimuli (distracter pictures: neutral, positive, or negative; targets: circle or square) and their presentation timecourse. Subject must press a button that corresponds to the circle/square target while ignoring the distracter pictures
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Group Differences in Reaction Time. Figure depicts group differences in reaction time (RT) on trials involving neutral, negative, and positive distracting pictures. Within-group found significant effects of picture emotion in both controls [F(2,64)=20.24, p<0.001] and BD subjects [F(2,112)=12.06, p<0.001]; both samples were significantly slower on the negative a and positive b picture trials when compared to neutral trials (p<0.001). However, the effect of emotion was nonsignificant in SMD subjects [F(2,80)=2.05, p=0.16], suggesting that their performance did not vary as a function of the emotional nature of the distracting picture. CON control subjects; BD bipolar disorder; SMD severe mood dysregulation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Group Differences in Reaction Time Attention Interference Scores. Figure depicts group differences in the reaction time (RT) attention interference score. Attention interference score = RT on trials with an emotional distracter—RT on trials with a neutral distracter. Scores are adjusted after controlling for age and IQ. On negative pictures, SMD subjects displayed a significantly lower attention interference compared to controls (p<0.0001) and BD subjects (p< 0.0001). Similarly, on positive pictures, SMD subjects displayed a significantly lower attention interference compared to controls (p< 0.001) and BD subjects (p<0.0001). Results indicate a blunted response to emotional stimuli in SMD subjects. BD bipolar disorder; SMD severe mood dysregulation; CON control subjects
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric; 1994.
    1. Ayduk O, Mischel W, Downey G. Attentional mechanisms linking rejection to hostile reactivity: the role of “hot” versus “cool” focus. Psychological Science. 2002;13:443–448. - PubMed
    1. Bird HR, Canino G, Rubio-Stipec M, Ribera JC. Further measures of the psychometric properties of the children’s global assessment scale. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1987;44:821–824. - PubMed
    1. Bird HR, Yager TJ, Staghezza B, Gould MS, Canino G, Rubio-Stipec M. Impairment in the epidemiological measurement of childhood psychopathology in the community. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1990;29:796–803. - PubMed
    1. Bolte S, Poustka F, Constantino JN. Assessing autistic traits: cross-cultural validation of the social responsiveness scale (SRS) Autism Research. 2008;1:354–363. - PubMed

Publication types