Cementless total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years and older
- PMID: 20180718
- PMCID: PMC2856203
- DOI: 10.3109/17453671003635900
Cementless total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years and older
Abstract
Background: Cemented total hip arthroplasty has been the treatment of choice for elderly patients with osteoarthritis. We analyzed survival rates of the most common cementless designs used in this age group in Finland.
Patients and methods: Inclusion criteria permitted 10,310 replacements (8 designs) performed in patients aged 55 years or older to be selected for evaluation. The risk of revision of each of the 8 implants was compared with that of a group comprising 3 cemented designs as the reference (9,549 replacements). Survival analyses were performed overall and separately for 3 age cohorts: 55-64 years (6,781 replacements), 65-74 years (8,821 replacements), and 75 years or older (4,257 replacements).
Results: In all patients aged 55 years or more, the Bi-Metric stem had a higher survival rate for aseptic loosening at 15 years than the cemented reference group: 96% (95% CI: 94-98) vs. 91% (CI: 90-92). However, the 15-year survival rates of the Bi-Metric/Press-Fit Universal (71% (CI: 67-75)) and the Anatomic Mesh/Harris-Galante II (72% (CI: 67-78)) total hip replacements were lower than that of the reference group (86% (CI: 84-87)). Information was scarce for patients aged 75 years or more.
Interpretation: Cementless proximal porous-coated stems are a good option for elderly patients. Even though biological fixation is a reliable fixation method in THA, polyethylene wear and osteolysis remain a serious problem for cementless cup designs with unplugged screw holes and low-quality liners.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2160-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. PMID: 18829914
-
Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years.Acta Orthop. 2011 Oct;82(5):521-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.618908. Acta Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21992084 Free PMC article.
-
Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):57-70. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045704. Acta Orthop. 2006. PMID: 16534703
-
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3):B5350. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28260601 Review.
-
High wear rates and extensive osteolysis in 3 types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a review of the PCA, the Harris Galante and the Profile/Tri-Lock Plus arthroplasties with a minimum of 12 years median follow-up in 96 hips.Acta Orthop. 2006 Aug;77(4):575-84. doi: 10.1080/17453670610012638. Acta Orthop. 2006. PMID: 16929433 Review.
Cited by
-
Migration of the uncemented Echo Bi-Metric and Bi-Metric THA stems: a randomized controlled RSA study involving 62 patients with 24-month follow-up.Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):693-698. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1802682. Epub 2020 Aug 6. Acta Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32757687 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of stem alignment on long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with cementless Bi-Metric femoral components.J Orthop. 2018 Jan 16;15(1):134-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.008. eCollection 2018 Mar. J Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29657457 Free PMC article.
-
Low evidence for implementation of well-documented implants regarding risk of early revision: a systematic review on total hip arthroplasty.EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Jan 4;6(1):3-8. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200047. eCollection 2021 Jan. EFORT Open Rev. 2021. PMID: 33542834 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective analysis.J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520944663. doi: 10.1177/0300060520944663. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32772652 Free PMC article.
-
Male gender, Charnley class C, and severity of bone defects predict the risk for aseptic loosening in the cup of ABG I hip arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Oct 19;11:243. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-243. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010. PMID: 20959001 Free PMC article.
References
-
- ABG II Cement Free Hip System www.stryker.fr/st pdf abgiicementlesssystem.pdf. (date last accessed 110808)
-
- Archibeck MJ, Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Quigley LR, Gitelis S, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight- to eleven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001;83:1666–73. - PubMed
-
- Barrack RL, Folgueras A, Munn B, Tvetden D, Sharkey P. Pelvic lysis and polyethylene wear at 5–8 years in a cementless total hip. Clin Orthop. 1997;((335)):211–7. - PubMed
-
- Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002;84:171–7. - PubMed
-
- Bojescul JA, Xenos JS, Callaghan JJ, Savory CG. Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years; a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003;85:1079–83. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical