Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;35(6):607-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

Depression vulnerability predicts cigarette smoking among college students: Gender and negative reinforcement expectancies as contributing factors

Holly E R Morrell  1 , Lee M Cohen, Dennis E McChargue
Affiliations

Depression vulnerability predicts cigarette smoking among college students: Gender and negative reinforcement expectancies as contributing factors

Holly E R Morrell et al. Addict Behav. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

This study examined the association between vulnerability to depression and smoking behavior in 1214 college students (54% female), and evaluated gender and expectancies of negative affect reduction as moderators or mediators of this relationship. Depression vulnerability predicted smoking in females, but not males. The relationship between depression vulnerability and smoking status was mediated by expectancies of negative affect reduction in females only. Female college students who are vulnerable to depression may smoke because they expect smoking to relieve negative affect. Smoking interventions for college females may increase in effectiveness by targeting depression and emphasizing mood regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Negative affect reduction expectancies as a mediator of the relationship between history of depression and smoking status (top panel), and between history of anhedonia and smoking status (bottom panel), for the total study sample. Statistics for the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable when the mediating variable is included in the regression model are presented in bold.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Negative affect reduction expectancies as a mediator of the relationship between history of depression and smoking status (top panel), and between history of anhedonia and smoking status (bottom panel), in females only. Statistics for the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable when the mediating variable is included in the regression model are presented in bold.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Negative affect reduction expectancies as a mediator of the relationship between history of depression and smoking status (top panel), and between history of anhedonia and smoking status (bottom panel), in males only. Statistics for the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable when the mediating variable is included in the regression model are presented in bold.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text revision ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Brandon TH, Baker TB. The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1991;3(3):484–491.
    1. Brandon TH, Juliano LM, Copeland AL. Expectancies for tobacco smoking. In: Kirsch I, editor. How expectancies shape experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. pp. 263–299.
    1. Brandon TH, Wetter DW, Baker TB. Affect, expectancies, urges, and smoking: Do they conform to models of drug motivation and relapse? Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1996;4(1):29–36.