Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;28(2):117-22.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-009-0395-3. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

Prospective comparative study of negative oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective comparative study of negative oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Satoru Morita et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare prospectively the image quality of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using manganese chloride tetrahydrate (Bothdel Oral Solution 10) (MCT), a new negative oral contrast agent; ferric ammonium citrate (FerriSeltz powder 20%) (FAC); and no agent.

Materials and methods: MRCP images (TE 970 ms) of patients administered MCT (n = 19) or FAC (n = 20) at random, and 18 patients without an agent were evaluated. The subjective image quality of the overall, extrahepatic bile duct, and pancreatic duct and the degree of elimination of gastrointestinal fluid scored by two radiologists blinded to information regarding the agent were compared using Mann-Whitney's U-test.

Results: The degrees of elimination of gastroduodenal fluid of MCT and FAC were significantly better than those without an agent (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01). The subjective image quality of MCT of the overall and extrahepatic bile duct were significantly better, although no significant differences for FAC were observed compared with those without an agent (P < 0.01 and P = 0.21, P = 0.02 and P = 0.16). There were no significant differences for the pancreatic duct (P = 0.12 and P = 0.19), nor were there any significant differences in the evaluations between MCT and FAC (P = 0.19-0.98).

Conclusion: MCT has shown performance comparable to that of conventional FAC in terms of pancreatic and biliary depiction and safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nihon Rinsho. 1998 Nov;56(11):2865-9 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Imaging. 1994;12(6):837-46 - PubMed
    1. Br J Radiol. 2004 Dec;77(924):991-9 - PubMed
    1. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1995 Aug;55(9):697-9 - PubMed
    1. Rofo. 2000 Jan;172(1):55-60 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources