A 9-year analysis of bibliographical trends for journals in the subject category of general and internal medicine
- PMID: 20183158
- DOI: 10.1080/08989620902984080
A 9-year analysis of bibliographical trends for journals in the subject category of general and internal medicine
Abstract
For academic research outcomes, an important bibliometric scoring termed as the journal impact factor (JIF) is used when assessment of the quality of research is required. No known study has been conducted to explore the bibliographical trends of 'Medicine, General & Internal' journals indexed by the annual Journal Citation Reports. Data from the Journal Citation Reports and Web of Science database were extracted to formulate a comprehensive analysis. In this study, the trends of 15 journals (5 top ranked and 10 low ranked; 5 English and 5 non-English based) were selected and analysed over a 9-year period (starting from year 1999 to 2007). Using the year 1999 as the base year, the results showed that the JIF rose significantly for the selected top ranked journals (up to 180.9%) while the low ranked ones slipped in their JIF value (down to -44.4%). The observed upward or downward trend was caused by a combination of other bibliographical measures like citations, number of citable, and total items published. It is postulated that changes in bibliographical trends can be classified as editorial and non-editorial influences. The impacts of these influences on the 15 selected journals over the 9-year period were also discussed retrospectively.
Similar articles
-
The retrospective analysis of bibliographical trends for nine biomedical engineering journals from 1999 to 2007.Ann Biomed Eng. 2009 Jul;37(7):1474-81. doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9700-7. Epub 2009 Apr 22. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009. PMID: 19387834
-
Effect of bibliographical classification on the impact factor of science- and engineering-based journals.Account Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/08989620802689516. Account Res. 2009. PMID: 19247850
-
Calculating impact factor: how bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals.Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Mar;14(1):41-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9044-3. Epub 2007 Nov 15. Sci Eng Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18004672
-
The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):115-28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Forensic Sci Int. 2007. PMID: 16784827 Review.
-
The ups and downs of journal impact factors.Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Mar;52(2):73-82. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men002. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008. PMID: 18316351 Review.
Cited by
-
Research development, current hotspots, and future directions of water research based on MODIS images: a critical review with a bibliometric analysis.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jun;24(18):15226-15239. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9107-1. Epub 2017 May 5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28477249 Review.
-
Impact of article language in multi-language medical journals--a bibliometric analysis of self-citations and impact factor.PLoS One. 2013 Oct 17;8(10):e76816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076816. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24146929 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources