Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;24(8):764-72.
doi: 10.1080/10410230903242242.

Predictors of perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: sociodemographic factors and mass media exposures

Paul K J Han  1 , Richard P Moser, William M P Klein, Ellen Burke Beckjord, Andrea C Dunlavy, Bradford W Hesse
Affiliations

Predictors of perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: sociodemographic factors and mass media exposures

Paul K J Han et al. Health Commun. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Cancer prevention recommendations reaching the public today are often ambiguous-that is, of uncertain reliability, credibility, or adequacy-yet little is known about the factors that influence public perceptions of this ambiguity. We used data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey, conducted by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, to explore how sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported mass media exposures relate to perceptions of ambiguity regarding recommendations for the prevention of colon, skin, and lung cancer. Various sociodemographic characteristics (age, education, race) and mass media exposures (television, radio, Internet, health news) were found to be associated with perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations, and many of these associations varied by cancer type. These findings have important implications for future health communication research and practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brodie M, Hamel EC, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM. Health news and the American public, 1996–2002. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law. 2003;28:927–950. - PubMed
    1. Camerer C, Weber M. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992;5:325–370.
    1. Consedine NS, Magai C, Neugut AI. The contribution of emotional characteristics to breast cancer screening among women from six ethnic groups. Preventive Medicine. 2004;38:64–77. - PubMed
    1. Cram P, Fendrick AM, Inadomi J, Cowen ME, Carpenter D, Vijan S. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: The Katie Couric effect. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003;163:1601–1605. - PubMed
    1. de Leeuw E, de Heer W. Trends in household survey non-response: A longitudinal and international comparison. In: Groves DADRM, Eltinge JL, Little RJA, editors. Survey nonresponse. New York: Wiley; 2002. pp. 121–134.

LinkOut - more resources