Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 25:18:3.
doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-3.

Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report

Gert Bronfort  1 , Mitch Haas, Roni Evans, Brent Leininger, Jay Triano
Affiliations

Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report

Gert Bronfort et al. Chiropr Osteopat. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this report is to provide a succinct but comprehensive summary of the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual treatment for the management of a variety of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods: The conclusions are based on the results of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), widely accepted and primarily UK and United States evidence-based clinical guidelines, plus the results of all RCTs not yet included in the first three categories. The strength/quality of the evidence regarding effectiveness was based on an adapted version of the grading system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force and a study risk of bias assessment tool for the recent RCTs.

Results: By September 2009, 26 categories of conditions were located containing RCT evidence for the use of manual therapy: 13 musculoskeletal conditions, four types of chronic headache and nine non-musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 49 recent relevant systematic reviews and 16 evidence-based clinical guidelines plus an additional 46 RCTs not yet included in systematic reviews and guidelines.Additionally, brief references are made to other effective non-pharmacological, non-invasive physical treatments.

Conclusions: Spinal manipulation/mobilization is effective in adults for: acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain; migraine and cervicogenic headache; cervicogenic dizziness; manipulation/mobilization is effective for several extremity joint conditions; and thoracic manipulation/mobilization is effective for acute/subacute neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for cervical manipulation/mobilization alone for neck pain of any duration, and for manipulation/mobilization for mid back pain, sciatica, tension-type headache, coccydynia, temporomandibular joint disorders, fibromyalgia, premenstrual syndrome, and pneumonia in older adults. Spinal manipulation is not effective for asthma and dysmenorrhea when compared to sham manipulation, or for Stage 1 hypertension when added to an antihypertensive diet. In children, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness for otitis media and enuresis, and it is not effective for infantile colic and asthma when compared to sham manipulation.Massage is effective in adults for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, migraine headache, and premenstrual syndrome. In children, the evidence is inconclusive for asthma and infantile colic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Translating Evidence to Action.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Categories of Conditions included in this report.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evidence Summary - Adults - Spinal Conditions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evidence Summary - Adults - Extremity Conditions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Evidence Summary - Adults - Headache and Other Conditions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Evidence Summary - Adults - Non-Musculoskeletal Conditions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Evidence Summary - Pediatrics - Non-Musculoskeletal Conditions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Goldberg M. On evidence and evidence-based medicine: lessons from the philosophy of science. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2621–2632. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson LH. In: In Feminist epistemologies. Alcoff, Potter E, editor. 1993. Epistemological communities; pp. 121–160.
    1. Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81:221–222. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2009;181:165–168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muir Gray JA. Evidence Based Healthcare How to make Health Policy and Management Decisions. 2. Harcourt Publishers Limited; 2001.