Rear seat occupant thorax protection in near side impacts
- PMID: 20184828
- PMCID: PMC3256794
Rear seat occupant thorax protection in near side impacts
Abstract
Thoracic side-airbags (SAB) have proven to protect front seat occupants in side impacts. This benefit has not been evaluated for rear seat occupants who are typically small statured. The objective was to analyze field data from rear seat occupants in near side impacts, and evaluate the effect of a SAB in the rear seat, through full scale vehicle tests. A field study using the NASS-CDS database was performed to review rear seat crash characteristics, occupant injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale 3+, AIS3+) and injury sources. Full scale tests were performed with the side impact dummy SID-IIs at two different crash severities, with and without SAB in a midsize passenger car. Field data showed that of all AIS3+ injured restrained occupants 13 years and older, 59% had AIS3+ thoracic injuries and 38% had AIS3+ head injuries. The thoracic injuries were distributed to lungs (60%), skeletal fractures (38%) and injuries to arteries (1,26%) and heart (0,1%). For AIS3+ injured children, age 4-12, 51% had AIS3+ thoracic injuries and 54% had AIS3+ head injuries. Compared to adults, children sustained less fractures and more lung injuries. The rear side interior was the main injury source regardless of age group. In the full scale tests, the thoracic side-airbag reduced the average rib deflection by 50% and resulted in an AIS3+ injury risk reduction from 36% to 3%. At the higher impact speed, SAB reduced the injury risk from 93% to 24%. The full scale crash tests showed that SAB offer a significant potential for thoracic injury reduction in the crash severities causing the majority of serious injuries in real life crashes.
Figures














Similar articles
-
Injuries in Full-Scale Vehicle Side Impact Moving Deformable Barrier and Pole Tests Using Postmortem Human Subjects.Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S224-30. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1062887. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015. PMID: 26436236
-
Fatal side impact crash scenarios for rear seat and seat belt-restrained occupants from vulnerable populations.Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S50-S56. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1641598. Epub 2019 Aug 5. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019. PMID: 31381380
-
Crash characteristics and injury patterns of restrained front seat occupants in far-side impacts.Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1(0 1):S27-34. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.935771. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014. PMID: 25307394 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive overview of the frequency and the severity of injuries sustained by car occupants and subsequent implications in terms of injury prevention.Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:165-74. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012. PMID: 23169126 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomechanics of side impact: injury criteria, aging occupants, and airbag technology.J Biomech. 2007;40(2):227-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Mar 9. J Biomech. 2007. PMID: 16527285 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Arbogast KB, Moll EK, Morris SD, Anderko RL, Durbin DR, Winston FK.Factors influencing pediatric injury in side impact collisions J Trauma 200151469–477.2001. - PubMed
-
- Arbogast KB, Chen I, Durbin DR, Winston FK. Injury risks for children in child restraint systems in side impact crashes. IRCOBI. 2004
-
- Braver E, Kyrychenko S. Efficacy of Side Airbags in ReducingDriver Deaths in Driver Side Collisions. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;159(6):556–564. - PubMed
-
- EuroNCAP, Child Protection Assessment Protocol Version 1.2, February 2009. Available online. http://www.euroncap.com/files/Euro-NCAP-Child-Protection-Assessment-Prot... Downloaded 20th of February, 2009.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical