Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jun;33(6):1288-90.
doi: 10.2337/dc09-1807. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Oral insulin: a comparison with subcutaneous regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Oral insulin: a comparison with subcutaneous regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes

Christoph Kapitza et al. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of an oral insulin (OI) formulation compared with subcutaneously injected regular human insulin (RHI).

Research design and methods: Ten male patients with type 2 diabetes (means +/- SD; A1C 7.0 +/- 1.1%; BMI 28.3 +/- 2.7 kg/m(2)) received either 300 units of insulin combined with 400 mg of delivery agent orally or 15 units RHI subcutaneously under isoglycemic clamp conditions.

Results: Maximum insulin concentration was greater and onset of action was faster with OI (C(max) 93 +/- 71 vs. 33 +/- 11 microU/ml; AUC(GIR)((0-1h)) 173 +/- 86 vs. 27 +/- 32 mg/kg; P < 0.05). Mean insulin concentration and glucose infusion rate returned to baseline within 3 h after OI administration. Relative bioavailability of OI was 7 +/- 4% (1st 2 h).

Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that absorption of OI is feasible under fasting conditions. OI has a fast onset and a short duration of action but also shows a rather high between-subject variability in absorption.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00982254.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A: Pharmacokinetic (plasma insulin concentration) response to administration of an oral insulin formulation (uninterrupted line) and subcutaneous regular human insulin (dotted line) at time = 0 h. Plasma insulin concentrations are presented as means ± SEM. AUCINS(0−1h): 2,559 ± 1,831 vs. 542 ± 296 μU · min−1 · ml−1, P < 0.05, AUCINS(0−6h): 3,225 ± 2,320 vs. 7,004 ± 2,440 μU · min−1 · ml−1, P < 0.05. B: Pharmacodynamic (GIR) response. GIRs are given for mean raw (thin line) and smoothed (bold line) data. AUCGIR(0−1h): 173 ± 86 vs. 27 ± 32 mg/kg, P < 0.05. AUCGIR(0−2h): 297 ± 143 vs. 137 ± 107 mg/kg, P < 0.05. AUCGIR(0−6h): (374 ± 135 vs. 651 ± 380 mg/kg). TGIRmax: 40 ± 16 vs. 255 ± 108 min, P < 0.05. TGIR-50%-early: 13 ± 6 vs. 150 ± 87 min, P < 0.05. TGIR-50%-late: 115 ± 79 vs. >360 min, P < 0.05. GIRmax: 4.4 ± 2.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.8 mg · kg−1 · min−1. sc, subcutaneous.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wajcberg E, Miyazaki Y, Triplitt C, Cersosimo E, DeFronzo RA: Dose-response effect of a single administration of oral hexyl-insulin monoconjugate 2 in healthy nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2868–2873 - PubMed
    1. Blackard WG, Nelson NC: Portal and peripheral vein immunoreactive insulin concentrations before and after glucose infusion. Diabetes 1970;19:302–306 - PubMed
    1. Yadav N, Morris G, Harding SE, Ang S, Adams GG: Various non-injectable delivery systems for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2009;9:1–13 - PubMed
    1. Heinemann L, Jacques Y: Oral insulin and buccal insulin: a critical reappraisal. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:568–584 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lassmann-Vague V, Raccah D: Alternatives routes of insulin delivery. Diabete Metab 2006;32:513–522 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data