Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;65(2):165-74.
doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008.

Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users

Daniela Gil  1 , Maria Cecília Martinelli Iorio
Affiliations

Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users

Daniela Gil et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss are often able to regain some lost auditory function with the help of hearing aids. However, hearing aids are not able to overcome auditory distortions such as impaired frequency resolution and speech understanding in noisy environments. The coexistence of peripheral hearing loss and a central auditory deficit may contribute to patient dissatisfaction with amplification, even when audiological tests indicate nearly normal hearing thresholds.

Objective: This study was designed to validate the effects of a formal auditory training program in adult hearing aid users with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Methods: FOURTEEN BILATERAL HEARING AID USERS WERE DIVIDED INTO TWO GROUPS: seven who received auditory training and seven who did not. The training program was designed to improve auditory closure, figure-to-ground for verbal and nonverbal sounds and temporal processing (frequency and duration of sounds). Pre- and post-training evaluations included measuring electrophysiological and behavioral auditory processing and administration of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) self-report scale.

Results: The post-training evaluation of the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in P3 latency, improved performance in some of the behavioral auditory processing tests and higher hearing aid benefit in noisy situations (p-value < 0,05). No changes were noted for the control group (p-value <0,05).

Conclusion: The results demonstrated that auditory training in adult hearing aid users can lead to a reduction in P3 latency, improvements in sound localization, memory for nonverbal sounds in sequence, auditory closure, figure-to-ground for verbal sounds and greater benefits in reverberant and noisy environments.

Keywords: Auditory Evoked Potentials; Hearing loss; Neuronal Plasticity; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stach BA. Diagnosing central auditory processing disorders in adults. In: Roeser RJ, Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, editors. Audiology – Diagnosis. New York: Thieme; 2000. pp. 355–79.
    1. Sweetow RW. Training the auditory brain to hear. The Hearing Journal. 2005;58:10–6.
    1. Musiek FE, Baran JA. Amplification and the central auditory nervous system. In: Valente M, editor. Hearing Aids: standards, options and limitations. New York: Thieme; 1996. pp. 407–37.
    1. Baran JA. Auditory processing disorders can negate the benefits of binaural amplification. The Hearing Journal. 2002;55:60.
    1. Stach B. Hearing aid amplification and central auditory disorders. In: Sandlin RE, editor. Textbook of hearing aid amplification. 2nd edition. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 2000. pp. 607–41.

Publication types