Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Jun;25(6):530-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1238-8. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices

Rainu Kaushal et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Although electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) holds promise for preventing prescription errors in the ambulatory setting, research on its effectiveness is inconclusive.

Objective: To assess the impact of a stand-alone e-prescribing system on the rates and types of ambulatory prescribing errors.

Design, participants: Prospective, non-randomized study using pre-post design of 15 providers who adopted e-prescribing with concurrent controls of 15 paper-based providers from September 2005 through June 2007.

Intervention: Use of a commercial, stand-alone e-prescribing system with clinical decision support including dosing recommendations and checks for drug-allergy interactions, drug-drug interactions, and duplicate therapies.

Main measures: Prescribing errors were identified by a standardized prescription and chart review.

Key results: We analyzed 3684 paper-based prescriptions at baseline and 3848 paper-based and electronic prescriptions at one year of follow-up. For e-prescribing adopters, error rates decreased nearly sevenfold, from 42.5 per 100 prescriptions (95% confidence interval (CI), 36.7-49.3) at baseline to 6.6 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 5.1-8.3) one year after adoption (p < 0.001). For non-adopters, error rates remained high at 37.3 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 27.6-50.2) at baseline and 38.4 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 27.4-53.9) at one year (p = 0.54). At one year, the error rate for e-prescribing adopters was significantly lower than for non-adopters (p < 0.001). Illegibility errors were very high at baseline and were completely eliminated by e-prescribing (87.6 per 100 prescriptions at baseline for e-prescribing adopters, 0 at one year).

Conclusions: Prescribing errors may occur much more frequently in community-based practices than previously reported. Our preliminary findings suggest that stand-alone e-prescribing with clinical decision support may significantly improve ambulatory medication safety.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Taconic Health Information Network and Community (THINC), NCT00225563, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00225563?term=Kaushal&rank=6 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Machan C, Siebert U. The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:585–600. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2667. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Accessed December 4, 2009, at http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/
    1. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Seger AC, et al. Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:837–841. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0194.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. eHealth Initiative foundation. A clinician’s guide to electronic prescribing. Washington, D.C.: eHealth Initiative Foundation, 2008.
    1. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. Jama. 1998;280:1311–1316. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1311. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data