Female-to-male breeding ratio in modern humans-an analysis based on historical recombinations
- PMID: 20188344
- PMCID: PMC2833377
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.029
Female-to-male breeding ratio in modern humans-an analysis based on historical recombinations
Erratum in
- Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun 11;86(6):982
Abstract
Was the past genetic contribution of women and men to the current human population equal? Was polygyny (excess of breeding women) present among hominid lineages? We addressed these questions by measuring the ratio of population recombination rates between the X chromosome and the autosomes, rho(X)/rho(A). The X chromosome recombines only in female meiosis, whereas autosomes undergo crossovers in both sexes; thus, rho(X)/rho(A) reflects the female-to-male breeding ratio, beta. We estimated beta from rho(X)/rho(A) inferred from genomic diversity data and calibrated with recombination rates derived from pedigree data. For the HapMap populations, we obtained beta of 1.4 in the Yoruba from West Africa, 1.3 in Europeans, and 1.1 in East Asian samples. These values are consistent with a high prevalence of monogamy and limited polygyny in human populations. More mutations occur during male meiosis as compared to female meiosis at the rate ratio referred to as alpha. We show that at alpha not equal 1, the divergence rates and genetic diversities of the X chromosome relative to the autosomes are complex functions of both alpha and beta, making their independent estimation difficult. Because our estimator of beta does not require any knowledge of the mutation rates, our approach should allow us to dissociate the effects of alpha and beta on the genetic diversity and divergence rate ratios of the sex chromosomes to the autosomes.
Copyright 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


Comment in
-
Sex-averaged recombination and mutation rates on the X chromosome: a comment on Labuda et al.Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun 11;86(6):978-80; author reply 980-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.021. Am J Hum Genet. 2010. PMID: 20541048 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity.PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 26;4(9):e1000202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000202. PLoS Genet. 2008. PMID: 18818765 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in life history and population size can explain the relative neutral diversity levels on X and autosomes in extant human populations.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):20063-20069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915664117. Epub 2020 Aug 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 32747577 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for increased levels of positive and negative selection on the X chromosome versus autosomes in humans.Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Sep;31(9):2267-82. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu166. Epub 2014 May 15. Mol Biol Evol. 2014. PMID: 24830675 Free PMC article.
-
The X chromosome in population genetics.Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Jan;5(1):43-51. doi: 10.1038/nrg1247. Nat Rev Genet. 2004. PMID: 14708015 Review. No abstract available.
-
Looking for signatures of sex-specific demography and local adaptation on the X chromosome.Genome Biol. 2010 Jan 28;11(1):203. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-1-203. Genome Biol. 2010. PMID: 20236443 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Variability in energy expenditure is much greater in males than females.J Hum Evol. 2022 Oct;171:103229. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103229. Epub 2022 Sep 15. J Hum Evol. 2022. PMID: 36115145 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Self-Reported Health, Happiness, and Marital Happiness of a Multinational Sample of Consensually Non-Monogamous Adults with Those of the U.S. General Population: Additional Comparisons by Gender, Number of Sexual Partners, Frequency of Sex, and Marital Status.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1287-1309. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01973-2. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34105057
-
Sex-averaged recombination and mutation rates on the X chromosome: a comment on Labuda et al.Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun 11;86(6):978-80; author reply 980-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.021. Am J Hum Genet. 2010. PMID: 20541048 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The inference of sex-biased human demography from whole-genome data.PLoS Genet. 2019 Sep 20;15(9):e1008293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008293. eCollection 2019 Sep. PLoS Genet. 2019. PMID: 31539367 Free PMC article.
-
How much does the unguarded X contribute to sex differences in life span?Evol Lett. 2022 Jul 5;6(4):319-329. doi: 10.1002/evl3.292. eCollection 2022 Aug. Evol Lett. 2022. PMID: 35937469 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dupanloup I., Pereira L., Bertorelle G., Calafell F., Prata M.J., Amorim A., Barbujani G. A recent shift from polygyny to monogamy in humans is suggested by the analysis of worldwide Y-chromosome diversity. J. Mol. Evol. 2003;57:85–97. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous