Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):115-23.
doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.001370.

Informatics, evidence-based care, and research; implications for national policy: a report of an American Medical Informatics Association health policy conference

Affiliations

Informatics, evidence-based care, and research; implications for national policy: a report of an American Medical Informatics Association health policy conference

Meryl Bloomrosen et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

There is an increased level of activity in the biomedical and health informatics world (e-prescribing, electronic health records, personal health records) that, in the near future, will yield a wealth of available data that we can exploit meaningfully to strengthen knowledge building and evidence creation, and ultimately improve clinical and preventive care. The American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) 2008 Health Policy Conference was convened to focus and propel discussions about informatics-enabled evidence-based care, clinical research, and knowledge management. Conference participants explored the potential of informatics tools and technologies to improve the evidence base on which providers and patients can draw to diagnose and treat health problems. The paper presents a model of an evidence continuum that is dynamic, collaborative, and powered by health informatics technologies. The conference's findings are described, and recommendations on terminology harmonization, facilitation of the evidence continuum in a "wired" world, development and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines and other knowledge support strategies, and the role of diverse stakeholders in the generation and adoption of evidence are presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dynamic and collaborative evidence continuum.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clancy CM. AHRQ's research efforts in comparative effectiveness. Statement before the U.S. House of representatives committee on ways and means, subcommittee on health. 2007 http://www.ahrq.gov/news/sp061207.htm
    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71–2 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. Committee on quality of health care in America. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000 - PubMed
    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001
    1. Detmer DE, Steen EB. Information and communications technology and the future health workforce: transformative opportunities and critical challenges. In: Holmes D, ed. From education to regulation: dynamic challenges for the health workforce Washington, DC: Association of Academic Health Centers, 2008:21–46 http://www.aahcdc.org/policy/reports/From_Education_to_Regulation.pdf

Publication types

MeSH terms